%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#2C3E50', 'primaryTextColor': '#fff', 'primaryBorderColor': '#16A085', 'lineColor': '#16A085', 'secondaryColor': '#E67E22', 'tertiaryColor': '#ecf0f1', 'fontSize': '13px'}}}%%
graph LR
subgraph BAND24["2.4 GHz Band"]
R24[Long Range<br/>Good Wall Penetration<br/>3 Non-Overlapping Channels<br/>More Interference]
end
subgraph BAND5["5 GHz Band"]
R5[Medium Range<br/>Moderate Penetration<br/>23+ Channels<br/>Less Interference]
end
subgraph BAND6["6 GHz Band (Wi-Fi 6E)"]
R6[Short Range<br/>Poor Penetration<br/>59 Channels<br/>No Legacy Interference]
end
style BAND24 fill:#16A085,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px
style BAND5 fill:#E67E22,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px
style BAND6 fill:#9B59B6,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px
837 Wi-Fi Frequency Bands and Channel Planning
837.1 Learning Objectives
By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:
- Compare the characteristics of 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz bands
- Identify non-overlapping channels and avoid interference
- Understand why only channels 1, 6, and 11 are recommended for 2.4 GHz
- Use channel planning strategies for multi-AP deployments
- Diagnose and resolve channel congestion issues
- Select the appropriate band for different IoT device types
837.2 Frequency Band Overview
Wi-Fi operates in three main frequency bands, each with distinct characteristics:
| Band | Frequency Range | Channels | Penetration | Speed | Congestion | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.4 GHz | 2400-2483.5 MHz | 11-14* | Excellent | Lower | High | Sensors, range priority |
| 5 GHz | 5150-5850 MHz | 23+ | Moderate | Higher | Lower | Cameras, high bandwidth |
| 6 GHz | 5925-7125 MHz | 59 | Poor | Highest | Lowest | Industrial, dense deployments |
*Channel availability varies by region (US: 11, EU: 13, Japan: 14)
837.3 2.4 GHz Band: The IoT Workhorse
837.3.1 Channel Layout and Overlap
The 2.4 GHz band has 14 channels (11 in US), but each channel is 22 MHz wide with only 5 MHz spacing between centers. This causes significant overlap:
Channel Layout (2.4 GHz):
CH1 CH2 CH3 CH4 CH5 CH6 CH7 CH8 CH9 CH10 CH11
Freq: 2412 2417 2422 2427 2432 2437 2442 2447 2452 2457 2462 MHz
Each channel spans 22 MHz:
CH1: |<-------- 22 MHz -------->|
2401 2423
CH6: |<-------- 22 MHz -------->|
2426 2448
Result: Channels 1-5 overlap with each other!
Only 1, 6, 11 are truly non-overlapping.
NEVER use channels 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, or 10 in the 2.4 GHz band!
These βin-betweenβ channels overlap with BOTH neighboring non-overlapping channels, causing worse interference than using 1, 6, or 11.
Example of WRONG configuration: - AP1: Channel 3 (overlaps with channels 1-6) - AP2: Channel 8 (overlaps with channels 5-11) - Result: Both APs interfere with ALL three non-overlapping channels
CORRECT configuration: - AP1: Channel 1 - AP2: Channel 6 - AP3: Channel 11 - Result: No overlap, maximum efficiency
837.3.2 2.4 GHz Interference Sources
The 2.4 GHz band is crowded with non-Wi-Fi devices:
| Device | Interference Type | Affected Channels |
|---|---|---|
| Microwave ovens | Broadband noise | All (worst on 7-11) |
| Bluetooth | Frequency hopping | All channels |
| Zigbee | Constant | Channels 11-13 (Zigbee 15-26) |
| Cordless phones | Varies | Often 1-3 or 6 |
| Baby monitors | Continuous | Often 1 or 6 |
| USB 3.0 ports | Broadband | 1-3 |
| Wireless cameras | Continuous | Varies |
Wi-Fi + Zigbee in same building: - Use Wi-Fi channel 1 or 6 (lower frequency) - Use Zigbee channel 25 or 26 (upper frequency, above Wi-Fi 11) - Maintain physical separation where possible
Wi-Fi + Bluetooth: - Bluetooth uses adaptive frequency hopping to avoid Wi-Fi - Most modern devices handle this automatically - Enable Bluetooth coexistence in AP settings if available
837.4 5 GHz Band: The High-Bandwidth Option
837.4.1 Channel Structure
The 5 GHz band offers 23+ non-overlapping channels (varies by region), organized into UNII bands:
| UNII Band | Frequency | Channels (20 MHz) | DFS Required? | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNII-1 | 5150-5250 MHz | 36, 40, 44, 48 | No | Best for IoT - no DFS |
| UNII-2A | 5250-5350 MHz | 52, 56, 60, 64 | Yes | Radar detection required |
| UNII-2C | 5470-5725 MHz | 100-140 | Yes | Weather radar overlap |
| UNII-3 | 5725-5850 MHz | 149, 153, 157, 161, 165 | No | Preferred for outdoor |
Channels 52-64 and 100-140 require DFS to avoid radar interference.
What this means for IoT: - If radar is detected, AP must switch channels within 10 seconds - IoT devices must re-associate (1-5 seconds downtime) - Not suitable for latency-critical applications - Outdoor APs may frequently trigger DFS near airports
Recommendation for IoT: Use UNII-1 (36-48) or UNII-3 (149-165) to avoid DFS disruptions.
837.4.2 Channel Width Options (5 GHz)
| Width | Throughput | Channels Available | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 MHz | ~100 Mbps | 23+ | Low-bandwidth IoT, maximum channels |
| 40 MHz | ~200 Mbps | 11+ | Balanced (common default) |
| 80 MHz | ~400 Mbps | 5-6 | Video streaming, cameras |
| 160 MHz | ~800 Mbps | 2-3 | Only for ultra-high bandwidth |
IoT Recommendation: Use 40 MHz for most deployments. Reserve 80 MHz for video cameras only.
837.5 6 GHz Band (Wi-Fi 6E): The Clean Slate
The 6 GHz band (5925-7125 MHz) offers 1200 MHz of new spectrum with no legacy devices:
837.5.1 Advantages for IoT:
- No legacy interference: Only Wi-Fi 6E devices allowed
- 59 channels at 20 MHz (vs 11 at 2.4 GHz)
- 7 non-overlapping 160 MHz channels
- Lower latency: Less contention, no legacy protection
837.5.2 Disadvantages for IoT:
- Shorter range: Higher frequency = more path loss
- Poor wall penetration: Concrete/brick blocks signal
- New hardware required: Wi-Fi 6E chips (2021+)
- Limited device support: Most IoT devices still 2.4/5 GHz
837.5.3 When to Use 6 GHz for IoT:
- High-density industrial environments
- Enterprise deployments with new equipment
- Applications requiring ultra-low latency
- When 2.4/5 GHz is severely congested
837.6 Frequency Selection Decision Guide
%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#2C3E50', 'primaryTextColor': '#fff', 'primaryBorderColor': '#16A085', 'lineColor': '#16A085', 'secondaryColor': '#E67E22', 'tertiaryColor': '#ecf0f1', 'fontSize': '12px'}}}%%
flowchart TD
START[IoT Device Type?]
START --> BATTERY{Battery Powered?}
BATTERY -->|Yes| USE24A[Use 2.4 GHz<br/>Lower power draw<br/>Longer sleep cycles]
BATTERY -->|No| BW{High Bandwidth<br/>Needed?}
BW -->|Yes, >5 Mbps| VIDEO{Video/Audio<br/>Streaming?}
BW -->|No, <1 Mbps| RANGE{Range<br/>Critical?}
VIDEO -->|Yes| USE5A[Use 5 GHz<br/>More bandwidth<br/>Less interference]
VIDEO -->|No| USE5B[Use 5 GHz<br/>40 MHz channels<br/>UNII-1 preferred]
RANGE -->|Yes, through walls| USE24B[Use 2.4 GHz<br/>Channel 1, 6, or 11<br/>Better penetration]
RANGE -->|No, same room| DENSE{Dense<br/>Deployment?}
DENSE -->|>50 devices| USE6[Consider 6 GHz<br/>If Wi-Fi 6E available<br/>Otherwise 5 GHz]
DENSE -->|<50 devices| USE24C[Use 2.4 GHz<br/>Simple, reliable]
style START fill:#2C3E50,stroke:#16A085,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style USE24A fill:#16A085,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
style USE24B fill:#16A085,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
style USE24C fill:#16A085,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
style USE5A fill:#E67E22,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
style USE5B fill:#E67E22,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
style USE6 fill:#9B59B6,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
837.7 Interactive Channel Analyzer
Use this interactive tool to explore Wi-Fi channel congestion and find the best channel for your IoT deployment:
This simulation helps you understand channel congestion in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands.
837.8 Channel Planning Strategies
837.8.1 Single AP Deployment
For homes and small offices with one access point:
2.4 GHz Strategy: 1. Use a Wi-Fi analyzer app to scan neighboring networks 2. Count networks on channels 1, 6, and 11 3. Select the least congested of the three 4. If all equally congested, choose channel 1 or 11 (edge channels)
5 GHz Strategy: 1. Use UNII-1 channels (36-48) for indoor IoT (no DFS) 2. Use UNII-3 channels (149-165) for outdoor or if 36-48 is busy 3. Avoid DFS channels (52-140) for latency-sensitive devices
837.8.2 Multi-AP Deployment
For offices or large homes with multiple access points:
Floor Plan Channel Assignment (2.4 GHz):
3-AP Layout (linear):
[AP1: Ch 1] -------- [AP2: Ch 6] -------- [AP3: Ch 11]
4-AP Layout (square):
[AP1: Ch 1] [AP2: Ch 6]
| |
[AP3: Ch 11] [AP4: Ch 1]
Multi-floor (checkerboard):
Floor 2: [Ch 6] [Ch 11]
Floor 1: [Ch 1] [Ch 6]
5 GHz Multi-AP (more flexibility):
Use different UNII bands for adjacent APs:
[AP1: Ch 36] -------- [AP2: Ch 149]
| |
[AP3: Ch 44] -------- [AP4: Ch 153]
837.9 Knowledge Check
837.10 Worked Example: Channel Planning for Multi-Floor Building
Scenario: A 4-floor office building needs Wi-Fi channel planning. Site survey reveals neighboring networks causing interference.
Given: - Building: 4 floors, 800 sqm each - APs per floor: 2 (8 total) - Site survey (2.4 GHz): - Channel 1: 3 networks (-65 to -75 dBm) - Channel 6: 7 networks (-55 to -70 dBm) - HIGH - Channel 11: 1 network (-80 dBm) - LOW - Floor separation: 15 dB attenuation
Solution:
- Avoid Channel 6 - Too congested with 7 competing networks
- Use diagonal pattern for vertical separation:
| Floor | West AP | East AP |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Ch 11 | Ch 1 |
| 3 | Ch 1 | Ch 11 |
| 2 | Ch 11 | Ch 1 |
| 1 | Ch 1 | Ch 11 |
Why this works: - Same-channel APs separated by 2 floors + horizontal offset - Combined isolation: 30+ dB (2 floors + distance) - No adjacent same-channel APs
Key Insight: In multi-floor buildings, use only channels 1 and 11, avoiding channel 6 entirely in urban environments where itβs typically most congested.
837.11 Whatβs Next
Continue to Wi-Fi Power Consumption to learn about optimizing Wi-Fi for battery-powered IoT devices, comparing power consumption across protocols, and implementing power-saving strategies.
- Wi-Fi Overview - Introduction and basics
- Wi-Fi Standards Evolution - 802.11 generations
- Wi-Fi Power Consumption - Battery optimization
- Wi-Fi Deployment Planning - Capacity and case studies