837  Wi-Fi Frequency Bands and Channel Planning

837.1 Learning Objectives

By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:

  • Compare the characteristics of 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz bands
  • Identify non-overlapping channels and avoid interference
  • Understand why only channels 1, 6, and 11 are recommended for 2.4 GHz
  • Use channel planning strategies for multi-AP deployments
  • Diagnose and resolve channel congestion issues
  • Select the appropriate band for different IoT device types

837.2 Frequency Band Overview

Wi-Fi operates in three main frequency bands, each with distinct characteristics:

Band Frequency Range Channels Penetration Speed Congestion Best For
2.4 GHz 2400-2483.5 MHz 11-14* Excellent Lower High Sensors, range priority
5 GHz 5150-5850 MHz 23+ Moderate Higher Lower Cameras, high bandwidth
6 GHz 5925-7125 MHz 59 Poor Highest Lowest Industrial, dense deployments

*Channel availability varies by region (US: 11, EU: 13, Japan: 14)

%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#2C3E50', 'primaryTextColor': '#fff', 'primaryBorderColor': '#16A085', 'lineColor': '#16A085', 'secondaryColor': '#E67E22', 'tertiaryColor': '#ecf0f1', 'fontSize': '13px'}}}%%
graph LR
    subgraph BAND24["2.4 GHz Band"]
        R24[Long Range<br/>Good Wall Penetration<br/>3 Non-Overlapping Channels<br/>More Interference]
    end

    subgraph BAND5["5 GHz Band"]
        R5[Medium Range<br/>Moderate Penetration<br/>23+ Channels<br/>Less Interference]
    end

    subgraph BAND6["6 GHz Band (Wi-Fi 6E)"]
        R6[Short Range<br/>Poor Penetration<br/>59 Channels<br/>No Legacy Interference]
    end

    style BAND24 fill:#16A085,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px
    style BAND5 fill:#E67E22,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px
    style BAND6 fill:#9B59B6,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px

Figure 837.1: Wi-Fi frequency bands: 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz with key characteristics

837.3 2.4 GHz Band: The IoT Workhorse

837.3.1 Channel Layout and Overlap

The 2.4 GHz band has 14 channels (11 in US), but each channel is 22 MHz wide with only 5 MHz spacing between centers. This causes significant overlap:

Channel Layout (2.4 GHz):
          CH1   CH2   CH3   CH4   CH5   CH6   CH7   CH8   CH9  CH10  CH11
Freq:   2412  2417  2422  2427  2432  2437  2442  2447  2452  2457  2462 MHz

Each channel spans 22 MHz:
CH1:  |<-------- 22 MHz -------->|
      2401                      2423

CH6:               |<-------- 22 MHz -------->|
                   2426                      2448

Result: Channels 1-5 overlap with each other!
        Only 1, 6, 11 are truly non-overlapping.
ImportantThe 1-6-11 Rule

NEVER use channels 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, or 10 in the 2.4 GHz band!

These β€œin-between” channels overlap with BOTH neighboring non-overlapping channels, causing worse interference than using 1, 6, or 11.

Example of WRONG configuration: - AP1: Channel 3 (overlaps with channels 1-6) - AP2: Channel 8 (overlaps with channels 5-11) - Result: Both APs interfere with ALL three non-overlapping channels

CORRECT configuration: - AP1: Channel 1 - AP2: Channel 6 - AP3: Channel 11 - Result: No overlap, maximum efficiency

837.3.2 2.4 GHz Interference Sources

The 2.4 GHz band is crowded with non-Wi-Fi devices:

Device Interference Type Affected Channels
Microwave ovens Broadband noise All (worst on 7-11)
Bluetooth Frequency hopping All channels
Zigbee Constant Channels 11-13 (Zigbee 15-26)
Cordless phones Varies Often 1-3 or 6
Baby monitors Continuous Often 1 or 6
USB 3.0 ports Broadband 1-3
Wireless cameras Continuous Varies
TipCoexistence Strategy

Wi-Fi + Zigbee in same building: - Use Wi-Fi channel 1 or 6 (lower frequency) - Use Zigbee channel 25 or 26 (upper frequency, above Wi-Fi 11) - Maintain physical separation where possible

Wi-Fi + Bluetooth: - Bluetooth uses adaptive frequency hopping to avoid Wi-Fi - Most modern devices handle this automatically - Enable Bluetooth coexistence in AP settings if available

837.4 5 GHz Band: The High-Bandwidth Option

837.4.1 Channel Structure

The 5 GHz band offers 23+ non-overlapping channels (varies by region), organized into UNII bands:

UNII Band Frequency Channels (20 MHz) DFS Required? Notes
UNII-1 5150-5250 MHz 36, 40, 44, 48 No Best for IoT - no DFS
UNII-2A 5250-5350 MHz 52, 56, 60, 64 Yes Radar detection required
UNII-2C 5470-5725 MHz 100-140 Yes Weather radar overlap
UNII-3 5725-5850 MHz 149, 153, 157, 161, 165 No Preferred for outdoor
WarningDFS (Dynamic Frequency Selection) Caution

Channels 52-64 and 100-140 require DFS to avoid radar interference.

What this means for IoT: - If radar is detected, AP must switch channels within 10 seconds - IoT devices must re-associate (1-5 seconds downtime) - Not suitable for latency-critical applications - Outdoor APs may frequently trigger DFS near airports

Recommendation for IoT: Use UNII-1 (36-48) or UNII-3 (149-165) to avoid DFS disruptions.

837.4.2 Channel Width Options (5 GHz)

Width Throughput Channels Available Use Case
20 MHz ~100 Mbps 23+ Low-bandwidth IoT, maximum channels
40 MHz ~200 Mbps 11+ Balanced (common default)
80 MHz ~400 Mbps 5-6 Video streaming, cameras
160 MHz ~800 Mbps 2-3 Only for ultra-high bandwidth

IoT Recommendation: Use 40 MHz for most deployments. Reserve 80 MHz for video cameras only.

837.5 6 GHz Band (Wi-Fi 6E): The Clean Slate

The 6 GHz band (5925-7125 MHz) offers 1200 MHz of new spectrum with no legacy devices:

837.5.1 Advantages for IoT:

  • No legacy interference: Only Wi-Fi 6E devices allowed
  • 59 channels at 20 MHz (vs 11 at 2.4 GHz)
  • 7 non-overlapping 160 MHz channels
  • Lower latency: Less contention, no legacy protection

837.5.2 Disadvantages for IoT:

  • Shorter range: Higher frequency = more path loss
  • Poor wall penetration: Concrete/brick blocks signal
  • New hardware required: Wi-Fi 6E chips (2021+)
  • Limited device support: Most IoT devices still 2.4/5 GHz

837.5.3 When to Use 6 GHz for IoT:

  • High-density industrial environments
  • Enterprise deployments with new equipment
  • Applications requiring ultra-low latency
  • When 2.4/5 GHz is severely congested

837.6 Frequency Selection Decision Guide

%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#2C3E50', 'primaryTextColor': '#fff', 'primaryBorderColor': '#16A085', 'lineColor': '#16A085', 'secondaryColor': '#E67E22', 'tertiaryColor': '#ecf0f1', 'fontSize': '12px'}}}%%
flowchart TD
    START[IoT Device Type?]

    START --> BATTERY{Battery Powered?}

    BATTERY -->|Yes| USE24A[Use 2.4 GHz<br/>Lower power draw<br/>Longer sleep cycles]

    BATTERY -->|No| BW{High Bandwidth<br/>Needed?}

    BW -->|Yes, >5 Mbps| VIDEO{Video/Audio<br/>Streaming?}
    BW -->|No, <1 Mbps| RANGE{Range<br/>Critical?}

    VIDEO -->|Yes| USE5A[Use 5 GHz<br/>More bandwidth<br/>Less interference]
    VIDEO -->|No| USE5B[Use 5 GHz<br/>40 MHz channels<br/>UNII-1 preferred]

    RANGE -->|Yes, through walls| USE24B[Use 2.4 GHz<br/>Channel 1, 6, or 11<br/>Better penetration]
    RANGE -->|No, same room| DENSE{Dense<br/>Deployment?}

    DENSE -->|>50 devices| USE6[Consider 6 GHz<br/>If Wi-Fi 6E available<br/>Otherwise 5 GHz]
    DENSE -->|<50 devices| USE24C[Use 2.4 GHz<br/>Simple, reliable]

    style START fill:#2C3E50,stroke:#16A085,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
    style USE24A fill:#16A085,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style USE24B fill:#16A085,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style USE24C fill:#16A085,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style USE5A fill:#E67E22,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style USE5B fill:#E67E22,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style USE6 fill:#9B59B6,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff

Figure 837.2: Decision tree for selecting the appropriate Wi-Fi frequency band for IoT devices

837.7 Interactive Channel Analyzer

Use this interactive tool to explore Wi-Fi channel congestion and find the best channel for your IoT deployment:

NoteWi-Fi Channel Analyzer Simulation

This simulation helps you understand channel congestion in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands.

837.8 Channel Planning Strategies

837.8.1 Single AP Deployment

For homes and small offices with one access point:

2.4 GHz Strategy: 1. Use a Wi-Fi analyzer app to scan neighboring networks 2. Count networks on channels 1, 6, and 11 3. Select the least congested of the three 4. If all equally congested, choose channel 1 or 11 (edge channels)

5 GHz Strategy: 1. Use UNII-1 channels (36-48) for indoor IoT (no DFS) 2. Use UNII-3 channels (149-165) for outdoor or if 36-48 is busy 3. Avoid DFS channels (52-140) for latency-sensitive devices

837.8.2 Multi-AP Deployment

For offices or large homes with multiple access points:

Floor Plan Channel Assignment (2.4 GHz):

3-AP Layout (linear):
  [AP1: Ch 1] -------- [AP2: Ch 6] -------- [AP3: Ch 11]

4-AP Layout (square):
  [AP1: Ch 1]          [AP2: Ch 6]
       |                    |
  [AP3: Ch 11]         [AP4: Ch 1]

Multi-floor (checkerboard):
  Floor 2: [Ch 6]  [Ch 11]
  Floor 1: [Ch 1]  [Ch 6]

5 GHz Multi-AP (more flexibility):

Use different UNII bands for adjacent APs:
  [AP1: Ch 36] -------- [AP2: Ch 149]
       |                    |
  [AP3: Ch 44] -------- [AP4: Ch 153]

837.9 Knowledge Check

837.10 Worked Example: Channel Planning for Multi-Floor Building

Scenario: A 4-floor office building needs Wi-Fi channel planning. Site survey reveals neighboring networks causing interference.

Given: - Building: 4 floors, 800 sqm each - APs per floor: 2 (8 total) - Site survey (2.4 GHz): - Channel 1: 3 networks (-65 to -75 dBm) - Channel 6: 7 networks (-55 to -70 dBm) - HIGH - Channel 11: 1 network (-80 dBm) - LOW - Floor separation: 15 dB attenuation

Solution:

  1. Avoid Channel 6 - Too congested with 7 competing networks
  2. Use diagonal pattern for vertical separation:
Floor West AP East AP
4 Ch 11 Ch 1
3 Ch 1 Ch 11
2 Ch 11 Ch 1
1 Ch 1 Ch 11

Why this works: - Same-channel APs separated by 2 floors + horizontal offset - Combined isolation: 30+ dB (2 floors + distance) - No adjacent same-channel APs

Key Insight: In multi-floor buildings, use only channels 1 and 11, avoiding channel 6 entirely in urban environments where it’s typically most congested.

837.11 What’s Next

Continue to Wi-Fi Power Consumption to learn about optimizing Wi-Fi for battery-powered IoT devices, comparing power consumption across protocols, and implementing power-saving strategies.