1286 Database Selection Tool
Choose the Right Database for IoT
1286.1 IoT Database Selection Advisor
Choosing the right database for an IoT application is a critical architectural decision. This interactive tool helps you evaluate and compare database options based on your specific workload requirements, data patterns, and scalability needs.
This advisor evaluates five popular database options for IoT:
- InfluxDB: Purpose-built time-series database with high write performance
- TimescaleDB: PostgreSQL extension combining SQL with time-series optimization
- MongoDB: Flexible document database for varied data structures
- Cassandra: Distributed database for massive scale and high availability
- PostgreSQL: Proven relational database with JSONB and TimescaleDB compatibility
- Adjust the workload parameters using the sliders and selectors
- View the recommendation that updates in real-time
- Examine the radar chart comparing all databases across key metrics
- Review the scoring breakdown to understand the reasoning
- Experiment with different configurations to see how requirements affect choices
1286.2 Understanding Database Selection for IoT
1286.2.1 Key Decision Factors
When selecting a database for IoT applications, consider these critical factors:
| Factor | Impact | Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Ingestion Rate | Write performance, buffering | High rates favor write-optimized DBs |
| Query Pattern | Index design, response time | Ad-hoc needs SQL; time-range needs ordering |
| Consistency | Data accuracy, latency | Financial/safety data needs strong consistency |
| Scale | Architecture, cost | Horizontal scaling for millions of devices |
| Retention | Storage, compression | Long retention needs efficient compression |
1286.2.2 Database Profiles
Best for: Pure time-series metrics with high write volume
- Native time-series database with retention policies
- Flux query language optimized for time-series operations
- Excellent for metrics dashboards (Grafana integration)
- Cardinality limits may affect high-dimensional data
Best for: Time-series data requiring SQL and joins
- PostgreSQL extension with automatic partitioning
- Full SQL support including JOINs and complex queries
- Continuous aggregates for efficient downsampling
- Excellent compression for time-series data
Best for: Varied data structures and document flexibility
- Schema-less design adapts to changing requirements
- Time-series collections (5.0+) with automatic bucketing
- Horizontal scaling with sharding
- Rich aggregation pipeline for analytics
Best for: Massive scale with high availability needs
- Linear scalability across datacenters
- Tunable consistency per operation
- Excellent write performance
- Best for known query patterns (no ad-hoc)
Best for: Complex relational queries and ACID requirements
- Most mature and proven technology
- Excellent for structured data with relationships
- Can be enhanced with TimescaleDB or Citus
- Rich ecosystem and tooling
1286.2.3 Decision Tree Summary
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β What's your primary β
β workload type? β
βββββββββββββ¬ββββββββββββββ
β
βββββββββββββ¬ββββββββββββΌββββββββββββ¬ββββββββββββ
βΌ βΌ βΌ βΌ βΌ
Time-Series Key-Value Document Relational Mixed
β β β β β
βΌ βΌ βΌ βΌ βΌ
InfluxDB/ Cassandra MongoDB PostgreSQL TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB
Option A: Schema-on-Write (Relational, Pre-defined Structure) - Data validation: Enforced at write time (reject malformed data immediately) - Query performance: Fast - optimizer knows exact column types and indexes - Storage efficiency: High - fixed-width columns, no schema overhead per record - Flexibility: Low - schema changes require migrations, downtime possible - Query latency: 2-10ms (optimized execution plans) - Best for: Device registry, billing, compliance data where structure is stable
Option B: Schema-on-Read (Document/Key-Value, Flexible Structure) - Data validation: Deferred to query time (accept anything, validate later) - Query performance: Variable - must parse documents, no guaranteed indexes - Storage efficiency: Lower - schema metadata embedded in each document - Flexibility: High - add fields anytime, no migrations needed - Query latency: 10-50ms (runtime parsing and type coercion) - Best for: Device telemetry with varying sensor types, event logs, config data
Decision Factors: - Choose Schema-on-Write when: Data structure is well-defined and stable, query performance is critical (<10ms SLA), data quality must be enforced at source, compliance requires data validation audit trails - Choose Schema-on-Read when: Sensor types vary across devices (heterogeneous fleet), schema evolves frequently (new firmware adds fields), rapid prototyping valued over data integrity, analytics team needs raw data flexibility - Hybrid approach: Schema-on-write for core metrics (temperature, humidity with strict types), schema-on-read for metadata (device config, custom attributes stored as JSONB) - Migration example: Adding βbattery_levelβ field - Schema-on-write requires ALTER TABLE + backfill; Schema-on-read accepts new field immediately
Option A: Single-Node Database (PostgreSQL, SQLite) - Operational complexity: Low - one server to manage, backup, monitor - Write throughput: 10K-100K writes/sec (limited by single CPU/disk) - Query latency: 1-10ms (no network hops, local execution) - Consistency: Strong ACID guarantees (single source of truth) - Cost: $200-500/month for powerful single instance (32GB RAM, NVMe) - Best for: < 50K sensors, < 100K writes/sec, team without distributed systems expertise
Option B: Distributed Database (Cassandra, CockroachDB, TimescaleDB Multi-Node) - Operational complexity: High - coordination, rebalancing, partition management - Write throughput: 500K-5M writes/sec (scales linearly with nodes) - Query latency: 5-50ms (network hops, consensus overhead) - Consistency: Configurable (strong or eventual, per operation) - Cost: $2,000-10,000/month for 5-10 node cluster with replication - Best for: > 100K sensors, > 500K writes/sec, HA requirements, multi-region deployment
Decision Factors: - Choose Single-Node when: Write volume under 100K/sec, total data under 5TB, team is small (1-2 engineers), latency requirements are strict (<10ms p99), budget is limited - Choose Distributed when: Write volume exceeds 200K/sec, need 99.99%+ availability (no single point of failure), data exceeds single-node capacity (10TB+), geographic distribution required (multi-datacenter) - Scaling path: Start single-node (PostgreSQL/TimescaleDB), add read replicas when reads bottleneck, shard when writes bottleneck or storage exceeds 5TB - Cost reality: 10-node cluster costs 10-20x more than single node but provides <10x performance gain for most IoT workloads - right-size your infrastructure
1286.3 Quick Start: Common Scenarios
Use these preset configurations to explore typical IoT database requirements:
| Scenario | Ingestion | Query Pattern | Scale | Best Choice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Home Hub | 100 msg/s | Real-time dashboard | 50 devices | InfluxDB or PostgreSQL |
| Industrial Monitoring | 10K msg/s | Time-range + alerts | 1,000 sensors | TimescaleDB |
| Fleet Tracking | 50K msg/s | Geospatial + history | 10K vehicles | MongoDB with geo indexes |
| Smart City Platform | 500K msg/s | Analytics + dashboards | 100K sensors | Cassandra + InfluxDB hybrid |
| Healthcare Wearables | 5K msg/s | Ad-hoc + compliance | 5K patients | PostgreSQL (HIPAA) |
1286.4 Knowledge Check
Knowledge Check: IoT Database Selection Quick Check
β Question 1: An IoT platform needs to store sensor data from 100,000 devices, each sending 1 reading/second. Which database characteristic is MOST important?
π‘ Explanation: At 100K devices Γ 1 msg/sec = 100,000 writes/second. This exceeds single-node PostgreSQL capacity (~50K/sec). Write throughput is the bottleneck. InfluxDB, TimescaleDB (multi-node), or Cassandra handle this volume. JOINs and ACID are nice-to-have but not the limiting factor.
β Question 2: A medical device company needs to store patient vital signs with strict audit requirements. Which database is MOST appropriate?
π‘ Explanation: Healthcare data requires HIPAA compliance with strict audit trails, data integrity, and often legal discovery requirements. PostgreSQLβs ACID guarantees, mature audit logging, and regulatory acceptance make it the standard for healthcare. Speed is secondary to compliance.
β Question 3: Your startup has 1,000 sensors and a 2-person engineering team. You expect 10x growth in 18 months. Whatβs the best initial database strategy?
π‘ Explanation: For small teams, operational simplicity trumps theoretical scalability. 1,000 sensors at 1 msg/sec = 1,000 writes/sec - easily handled by single-node. TimescaleDB gives growth path (add replicas, then multi-node) without immediate distributed system complexity. Over-engineering early wastes resources.