812  Electromagnetic Waves and Spectrum Basics

812.1 Introduction

⏱️ ~12 min | ⭐ Foundational | 📋 P08.C16A.U01

Wireless connectivity is often where IoT deployments succeed or fail—not because a protocol is “good” or “bad,” but because frequency band choice, propagation, regulations, and power budgets were misunderstood. This chapter focuses on the fundamental physics of electromagnetic waves that underpin all wireless communication.

NoteLearning Objectives

By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:

  • Explain the fundamental properties of electromagnetic waves (frequency, wavelength, energy)
  • Compute wavelength from frequency using the wave equation
  • Describe how the electromagnetic spectrum is organized for wireless communication
  • Identify where common IoT technologies operate within the radio frequency spectrum
  • Understand the relationship between frequency and wavelength for antenna design

812.2 Prerequisites

Before diving into this chapter, you should be familiar with:

Next in Series: - IoT Frequency Bands and Licensing - 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and sub-GHz bands - Cellular Spectrum for IoT - LTE-M, NB-IoT, and 5G - Propagation and Design - Path loss, interference, band selection

Deep Dives: - Mobile Wireless Comprehensive Review - Cellular evolution and IoT technologies - Mobile Wireless Labs - Spectrum analysis and RF measurements

Specific Technologies: - Wi-Fi Fundamentals - 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz wireless networking - Bluetooth Overview - Short-range 2.4 GHz communication - LoRaWAN Overview - Sub-GHz long-range LPWAN

NoteKey Takeaway

In one sentence: All wireless communication relies on electromagnetic waves, where frequency determines range, bandwidth, and penetration characteristics.

Remember this: Lower frequencies travel farther and penetrate better; higher frequencies carry more data but over shorter distances.

When you use your smartphone, smartwatch, or wireless earbuds, you’re leveraging multiple wireless technologies simultaneously—cellular for internet, Wi-Fi for local networks, Bluetooth for accessories, NFC for payments. But how does wireless communication actually work at a fundamental level?

The Physics: All wireless technologies use electromagnetic waves—the same phenomenon that brings you radio broadcasts, TV signals, and even sunlight. These waves travel at the speed of light and don’t need any physical medium (unlike sound waves that need air). When your IoT sensor sends data, it converts digital bits into electromagnetic waves that ripple through space until a receiver detects and decodes them.

Frequency Matters: Different wireless technologies use different frequencies (measured in Hertz). Think of frequency like the pitch of a musical note—high frequencies carry more information but don’t travel as far through walls and obstacles. 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi is like a high-pitched note—fast but blocked by walls. Sub-GHz LoRa is like a deep bass note—travels far and penetrates walls but carries less information.

Term Simple Explanation
Electromagnetic Wave Energy wave traveling through space carrying information
Frequency Wave cycles per second (Hertz)—determines range/bandwidth trade-off
Wavelength Physical distance between wave peaks—inversely related to frequency
Modulation Encoding digital data onto electromagnetic waves

Wireless signals are like invisible messengers flying through the air to deliver important information!

812.2.1 The Sensor Squad Adventure: The Great Frequency Race

Sammy the Temperature Sensor had a big problem. He needed to send a message to his friend Max the Motion Detector, who was way across the farm watching the chicken coop. But how could he send a message without any wires?

“I know!” said Lila the Light Sensor. “We can use radio waves! They’re like invisible runners that carry our messages through the air.”

Bella the Button explained, “But here’s the tricky part - we have different types of runners. Some run FAST but get tired quickly and can’t go very far. Others run SLOW but can go really, really far without getting tired!”

Sammy was confused. “Which runner should I use?”

Lila drew a picture in the dirt. “The fast runners are like high-pitched sounds - they carry LOTS of information but stop when they hit a wall. The slow runners are like deep bass sounds - they carry less information but can go through walls and travel for miles!”

So Sammy chose a slow, steady runner (a sub-GHz wave) to send his simple message: “Temperature: 72 degrees - chickens are happy!” The message traveled all the way across the farm, through the barn walls, and reached Max perfectly!

812.2.2 Key Words for Kids

Word What It Means
Radio Waves Invisible energy that carries messages through the air, like invisible runners
Frequency How fast the wave wiggles - high frequency is like running fast, low frequency is like walking slowly
Wavelength How long each “step” of the wave is - fast runners take tiny steps, slow runners take big steps

812.2.3 Try This at Home!

The Sound Distance Experiment

  1. Go to one end of your house with a friend at the other end
  2. First, try making a HIGH sound (like “eeee!”) - can your friend hear it clearly?
  3. Now try making a LOW sound (like “oooom”) - can your friend hear this one better?
  4. Try it with a door closed between you - which sound travels through better?

The LOW sounds usually travel farther and go through doors better - just like low-frequency radio waves travel farther and go through walls better!


812.3 Fundamentals of Wireless Communication

⏱️ ~15 min | ⭐⭐ Intermediate | 📋 P08.C16A.U02

812.3.1 Electromagnetic Waves

Wireless technologies use electromagnetic waves to carry information between devices. Unlike sound waves or water waves, electromagnetic waves (also called electromagnetic radiation) travel through space-time—they don’t need a medium like water or air to propagate. This property makes them ideal for wireless communication across various distances and environments.

Electromagnetic waves carry electromagnetic radiant energy and exhibit properties of both waves and particles. For wireless communication, we focus on their wave properties:

  • Frequency (f): The number of wave cycles per second, measured in Hertz (Hz)
  • Wavelength (λ): The physical distance between wave peaks, measured in meters
  • Energy (E): The energy carried by the wave, related to frequency

Chart of electromagnetic spectrum displaying frequency ranges from radio waves through microwave, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, X-rays to gamma rays with corresponding wavelengths and applications

Electromagnetic spectrum showing frequency ranges for wireless communications
Figure 812.1

Diagram showing frequency spectrum allocation for various wireless technologies including AM/FM radio, cellular networks, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and other IoT protocols across different frequency bands

Frequency spectrum allocation for wireless technologies
Figure 812.2

%% fig-cap: "Electromagnetic wave properties showing the inverse relationship between frequency and wavelength"
%% fig-alt: "Diagram illustrating electromagnetic wave characteristics with frequency measured in Hertz (cycles per second), wavelength measured in meters (distance between peaks), and the speed of light equation c = f × λ showing higher frequency corresponds to shorter wavelength and higher energy"
%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#2C3E50', 'primaryTextColor': '#2C3E50', 'primaryBorderColor': '#16A085', 'lineColor': '#16A085', 'secondaryColor': '#E67E22', 'tertiaryColor': '#ECF0F1', 'noteTextColor': '#2C3E50', 'noteBkgColor': '#ECF0F1'}}}%%
graph LR
    A["Electromagnetic Wave"] --> B["Frequency (f)<br/>Cycles per second<br/>Unit: Hertz (Hz)"]
    A --> C["Wavelength (λ)<br/>Distance between peaks<br/>Unit: meters (m)"]
    A --> D["Energy (E)<br/>Wave energy<br/>E = h × f"]

    B --> E["Higher Frequency<br/>2.4 GHz, 5 GHz<br/>More cycles/sec"]
    B --> F["Lower Frequency<br/>868 MHz, 433 MHz<br/>Fewer cycles/sec"]

    E --> G["Shorter Wavelength<br/>12.5 cm at 2.4 GHz<br/>Higher Energy"]
    F --> H["Longer Wavelength<br/>34.5 cm at 868 MHz<br/>Lower Energy"]

    style A fill:#2C3E50,stroke:#16A085,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
    style E fill:#E67E22,stroke:#16A085,stroke-width:2px
    style F fill:#16A085,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style G fill:#E67E22,stroke:#16A085,stroke-width:2px
    style H fill:#16A085,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff

Figure 812.3: Electromagnetic wave properties and the inverse relationship between frequency and wavelength (c = f × λ).

This variant shows the same frequency-wavelength relationship as a practical decision matrix - emphasizing what you gain and lose at each frequency band for IoT applications.

%% fig-alt: "Frequency band decision matrix for IoT: Sub-GHz (433/868/915 MHz) offers long range and wall penetration but low bandwidth, ideal for sensors. 2.4 GHz offers balanced range/bandwidth but crowded spectrum, good for smart home. 5+ GHz offers high bandwidth but short range, suited for video/AR."
%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#2C3E50', 'primaryTextColor': '#fff', 'primaryBorderColor': '#16A085', 'lineColor': '#E67E22', 'secondaryColor': '#16A085', 'tertiaryColor': '#7F8C8D', 'fontSize': '10px'}}}%%
flowchart TB
    subgraph SUBGHZ["SUB-GHz (433/868/915 MHz)"]
        direction LR
        SG_GOOD["Range: km-scale<br/>Penetration: Excellent<br/>Battery: Years"]
        SG_BAD["Bandwidth: kbps<br/>Latency: Variable"]
        SG_USE["Best for:<br/>Sensors, Meters,<br/>Agriculture"]
    end

    subgraph TWOFOUR["2.4 GHz (Wi-Fi/BLE/Zigbee)"]
        direction LR
        TF_GOOD["Range: 10-100m<br/>Bandwidth: Mbps<br/>Ecosystem: Huge"]
        TF_BAD["Interference: High<br/>Penetration: Moderate"]
        TF_USE["Best for:<br/>Smart Home,<br/>Wearables"]
    end

    subgraph FIVEGHZ["5+ GHz (Wi-Fi/mmWave)"]
        direction LR
        FG_GOOD["Bandwidth: Gbps<br/>Channels: Many<br/>Latency: Low"]
        FG_BAD["Range: Short<br/>Penetration: Poor"]
        FG_USE["Best for:<br/>Video, AR/VR,<br/>Industrial"]
    end

    SUBGHZ -->|"+Frequency"| TWOFOUR
    TWOFOUR -->|"+Frequency"| FIVEGHZ

    style SG_GOOD fill:#16A085,stroke:#2C3E50,color:#fff
    style SG_BAD fill:#e74c3c,stroke:#2C3E50,color:#fff
    style SG_USE fill:#2C3E50,stroke:#16A085,color:#fff
    style TF_GOOD fill:#16A085,stroke:#2C3E50,color:#fff
    style TF_BAD fill:#e74c3c,stroke:#2C3E50,color:#fff
    style TF_USE fill:#2C3E50,stroke:#16A085,color:#fff
    style FG_GOOD fill:#16A085,stroke:#2C3E50,color:#fff
    style FG_BAD fill:#e74c3c,stroke:#2C3E50,color:#fff
    style FG_USE fill:#2C3E50,stroke:#16A085,color:#fff

Figure 812.4: Frequency band decision matrix: what you gain and lose at each band for IoT

Key Insight: There’s no “best” frequency - only the right one for your application. Start with your requirements (range, data rate, power budget) and work backwards to the appropriate band.

NoteQuick Reference: Rules of Thumb
  • Wavelength: λ = c / fλ (cm) ≈ 30 / f (GHz)
  • FSPL impact (free space): doubling distance ≈ +6 dB; doubling frequency ≈ +6 dB
  • Common wavelengths: 868 MHz ≈ 34.5 cm, 915 MHz ≈ 32.8 cm, 2.4 GHz ≈ 12.5 cm, 5 GHz ≈ 6.0 cm
  • Real deployments add multipath fading, obstacles, antenna gain/loss, and noise floor effects.

812.3.2 The Wave-Energy Relationship

The fundamental relationships governing electromagnetic waves are:

\[ c = f \times \lambda \]

Where: - \(c\) = speed of light (approximately \(3 \times 10^8\) m/s) - \(f\) = frequency in Hertz (Hz) - \(\lambda\) = wavelength in meters (m)

This means: - Higher frequency → Shorter wavelength → Higher energy - Lower frequency → Longer wavelength → Lower energy

The energy of electromagnetic radiation is given by:

\[ E = h \times f \]

Where: - \(E\) = energy in Joules - \(h\) = Planck’s constant (\(6.626 \times 10^{-34}\) J·s) - \(f\) = frequency in Hz

NoteNote: Photon Energy vs RF Power

The equation \(E = h f\) describes energy per photon. In most IoT radio design, we treat signals classically: range and battery life are dominated by transmit power, antenna gains, receiver sensitivity, and path loss (FSPL + obstacles), not the quantum energy of individual photons.

812.4 The Electromagnetic Spectrum

⏱️ ~10 min | ⭐ Foundational | 📋 P08.C16A.U03

812.4.1 Spectrum Overview

The electromagnetic spectrum encompasses all types of electromagnetic radiation, from radio waves to gamma rays. Visible light is just a small portion of this spectrum. The different regions are distinguished by their frequency and wavelength characteristics.

%% fig-cap: "Electromagnetic spectrum regions showing frequency and wavelength ranges"
%% fig-alt: "Complete electromagnetic spectrum from radio waves (lowest frequency, longest wavelength) through microwave, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, X-rays, to gamma rays (highest frequency, shortest wavelength), with IoT wireless technologies operating in the radio and microwave regions"
%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#2C3E50', 'primaryTextColor': '#2C3E50', 'primaryBorderColor': '#16A085', 'lineColor': '#16A085', 'secondaryColor': '#E67E22', 'tertiaryColor': '#ECF0F1'}}}%%
graph LR
    A["Electromagnetic<br/>Spectrum"] --> B["Radio Waves<br/>3 kHz - 300 GHz<br/>IoT operates here"]
    A --> C["Microwave<br/>300 MHz - 300 GHz<br/>Wi-Fi, Cellular"]
    A --> D["Infrared<br/>300 GHz - 430 THz"]
    A --> E["Visible Light<br/>430-770 THz"]
    A --> F["Ultraviolet<br/>770 THz - 30 PHz"]
    A --> G["X-Rays<br/>30 PHz - 30 EHz"]
    A --> H["Gamma Rays<br/>> 30 EHz"]

    B --> I["Increasing Frequency →"]
    H --> I
    I --> J["← Decreasing Wavelength"]

    style A fill:#2C3E50,stroke:#16A085,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
    style B fill:#16A085,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
    style C fill:#16A085,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style I fill:#E67E22,stroke:#16A085,stroke-width:2px
    style J fill:#E67E22,stroke:#16A085,stroke-width:2px

Figure 812.5: Electromagnetic spectrum overview highlighting the radio/microwave regions used by common IoT technologies.

812.4.2 Radio Frequency Spectrum for IoT

Radio waves occupy the portion of the electromagnetic spectrum with the longest wavelength and the lowest frequency. This makes them ideal for wireless communication because:

  1. Long-range propagation: Lower frequencies travel farther
  2. Building penetration: Longer wavelengths pass through obstacles better
  3. Easier link budgets: Lower path loss often means less transmit power is needed for the same received signal level (all else equal)
  4. Well-understood technology: Mature standards and components

%% fig-cap: "Radio frequency bands used for IoT applications"
%% fig-alt: "Radio spectrum allocation showing different frequency bands for IoT: sub-GHz bands (433/868/915 MHz) for long-range LPWAN, 2.4 GHz ISM band for Wi-Fi/Bluetooth/Zigbee, and 5 GHz band for high-speed Wi-Fi, with characteristics of range vs bandwidth trade-offs"
%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#2C3E50', 'primaryTextColor': '#2C3E50', 'primaryBorderColor': '#16A085', 'lineColor': '#16A085', 'secondaryColor': '#E67E22', 'tertiaryColor': '#ECF0F1'}}}%%
graph TB
    A["Radio Frequency<br/>Spectrum for IoT"] --> B["Sub-GHz Bands<br/>433, 868, 915 MHz"]
    A --> C["2.4 GHz ISM Band<br/>2.4 - 2.483 GHz"]
    A --> D["5 GHz Band<br/>5.15 - 5.875 GHz"]

    B --> B1["✓ Long Range 10+ km<br/>✓ Excellent Penetration<br/>✓ Low Power<br/>✗ Low Bandwidth"]
    C --> C1["✓ Global Availability<br/>✓ Balanced Range/Speed<br/>✗ Crowded Spectrum<br/>✗ Interference"]
    D --> D1["✓ High Bandwidth<br/>✓ Less Interference<br/>✗ Short Range<br/>✗ Poor Penetration"]

    B --> B2["LoRaWAN, Sigfox<br/>Z-Wave, proprietary FSK"]
    C --> C2["Wi-Fi, Bluetooth<br/>Zigbee, Thread"]
    D --> D2["Wi-Fi 5/6<br/>High-speed only"]

    style A fill:#2C3E50,stroke:#16A085,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
    style B fill:#16A085,stroke:#2C3E50,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style C fill:#E67E22,stroke:#16A085,stroke-width:2px
    style D fill:#E67E22,stroke:#16A085,stroke-width:2px

Figure 812.6: Radio spectrum overview of common IoT bands (sub‑GHz, 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz) and their range vs bandwidth trade-offs.

812.5 Summary

This chapter introduced the fundamental physics of electromagnetic waves for wireless communication:

  • Electromagnetic waves enable wireless communication, characterized by frequency, wavelength, and energy
  • Higher frequency signals have shorter wavelengths and higher energy but experience greater path loss
  • The fundamental wave equation c = f × λ governs the relationship between frequency and wavelength
  • Radio waves (3 kHz - 300 GHz) are ideal for IoT because they balance range, penetration, and data capacity
  • IoT wireless technologies operate across sub-GHz, 2.4 GHz, and 5 GHz bands, each with distinct trade-offs

812.6 What’s Next

Continue with the next chapters in this series:


812.7 Knowledge Check

  1. Which relationship correctly describes wavelength (λ) and frequency (f) for electromagnetic waves?

Wave speed is approximately the speed of light (c) in free space, so λ = c / f. Higher frequency means shorter wavelength.

  1. Why are radio waves particularly well-suited for IoT wireless communication?

Radio waves have the longest wavelengths in the EM spectrum, allowing them to travel long distances and penetrate obstacles better than higher-frequency waves.

  1. What is the approximate wavelength of a 2.4 GHz signal?

Using λ = c/f, at 2.4 GHz: λ ≈ 30/2.4 = 12.5 cm. This wavelength affects antenna design and penetration characteristics.