677  Protocol Overhead Calculator

677.1 Protocol Overhead Calculator

This interactive tool calculates and compares protocol overhead across different IoT protocols, helping you understand the true cost of data transmission and optimize your protocol selection for constrained networks.

677.1.1 Configuration Panel

677.1.1.1 Message Parameters

677.1.1.2 Network Stack Configuration

677.1.2 Overhead Calculation Results

677.1.2.1 Summary Statistics

677.1.3 Stacked Bar Chart - Layer Breakdown

677.1.4 Pie Chart - Overhead vs Payload Distribution

677.1.5 Detailed Comparison Table

677.1.6 Efficiency Metrics Dashboard

677.1.7 Messages Per MTU Analysis

677.1.8 Overhead Ratio Analysis

677.1.9 Protocol Stack Visualization

677.1.10 Constrained Network Analysis

677.1.11 Recommendations

677.1.12 Export Results

677.2 Understanding Protocol Overhead

677.2.1 What is Protocol Overhead?

Protocol overhead refers to the additional bytes required beyond your actual data (payload) to successfully transmit a message. This overhead comes from multiple layers of the network stack:

  1. Application Layer: Protocol-specific headers, topic names, message identifiers, QoS flags
  2. Transport Layer: TCP/UDP headers, TLS/DTLS encryption overhead
  3. Network Layer: IP headers (IPv4: 20 bytes, IPv6: 40 bytes)
  4. Link Layer: Frame headers, preambles, checksums

677.2.2 Why Does Overhead Matter?

NoteImpact on Constrained Devices

For IoT devices with limited bandwidth, battery, or memory, every byte counts. High protocol overhead can:

  • Increase power consumption: More bytes = more radio transmission time
  • Reduce effective throughput: Less payload per packet
  • Cause fragmentation: Messages exceeding MTU require multiple packets
  • Increase latency: More packets mean more transmission cycles

677.2.3 Protocol Overhead Characteristics

Protocol Typical Overhead Best For
MQTT 3.1.1 2-5 bytes + topic Pub/sub messaging
CoAP 4 bytes + options Constrained devices
HTTP/1.1 100-500 bytes Web integration
HTTP/2 20-50 bytes Multiplexed streams
AMQP 8+ bytes Enterprise messaging
LwM2M 6+ bytes Device management

677.2.4 MTU Considerations

Different network technologies have different Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) sizes:

  • Ethernet: 1500 bytes
  • Wi-Fi: 2304 bytes
  • 802.15.4: 127 bytes (very constrained!)
  • BLE: 251 bytes
  • LoRa: 255 bytes
WarningFragmentation Impact

When a message exceeds the MTU, it must be fragmented into multiple packets. Each fragment incurs:

  • Additional header overhead
  • Reassembly buffer requirements
  • Risk of packet loss affecting entire message
  • Increased latency from multiple transmissions

677.3 Key Takeaways

TipProtocol Selection Guidelines
  1. For constrained networks (802.15.4, BLE): Use CoAP or MQTT-SN with small payloads
  2. For small sensor readings: Binary protocols vastly outperform text-based ones
  3. For large data transfers: Protocol overhead becomes less significant; focus on compression
  4. For secure communications: DTLS overhead is significant; pre-shared keys help reduce handshake overhead
  5. For variable payload sizes: Consider protocols with efficient variable-length encoding