403 WSN Tracking Implementation: Algorithms and Architecture

403.1 Learning Objectives

By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:

Select Appropriate Tracking Algorithms: Choose between Kalman Filter (linear motion) and Particle Filter (non-linear motion) based on target behavior and system constraints
Design Implementation Architecture: Understand the 8-phase tracking pipeline from detection to output
Implement State Machines: Build energy-efficient sensor state transitions (sleep, idle, detecting, reporting, clustering)
Apply Filter Decision Criteria: Use motion model validation and innovation sequence monitoring for algorithm selection

403.2 Prerequisites

Before diving into this chapter, you should be familiar with:

WSN Tracking: Fundamentals: Understanding tracking formulations (push, poll, guided), tracking components (detection, cooperation, prediction), and energy management strategies provides the conceptual foundation for implementations
WSN Overview: Implementations: Experience with Python WSN simulators, energy management, and duty cycling implementations prepares you for building tracking systems

403.3 Algorithm Selection Principles

Common Misconception: “Kalman Filters Always Work Best”

The Myth: “Kalman Filters are the gold standard for tracking, so I should use them for all applications.”

The Reality: Kalman Filters assume linear motion with Gaussian noise and fail catastrophically for non-linear trajectories. Real-world tracking often requires filter switching or particle filters.

Quantified Impact from Wildlife Tracking Study (Yellowstone National Park, 2019-2023): - Wolf pack tracking (non-linear paths, hunting behavior): - Kalman Filter RMSE: 42.3 meters (wolves make sharp turns, unpredictable stops) - Particle Filter RMSE: 8.7 meters (handles non-linear motion) - 79% accuracy improvement with Particle Filter - False track loss: Kalman 23%, Particle 4% (5.8x more reliable)

Elk migration tracking (linear paths, steady movement):
- Kalman Filter RMSE: 3.2 meters (optimal for straight-line motion)
- Particle Filter RMSE: 5.1 meters (computational overkill)
- 37% worse accuracy with Particle Filter
- Energy cost: Kalman 100 mW, Particle 450 mW (4.5x more power)

Lesson: Choose filters based on motion model: - Kalman Filter: Linear motion (vehicles on highways, elk migration, conveyor belts) - 1-2m RMSE, <100 mW - Particle Filter: Non-linear motion (wildlife hunting, drone swarms, human crowds) - 5-10m RMSE, 300-500 mW - Hybrid Approach: Use Kalman by default (energy-efficient), switch to Particle when motion model fails (detect via innovation outliers)

Real deployment at Yellowstone: Hybrid system achieved 6.8m average RMSE with 65% energy savings by running Kalman 80% of the time and Particle only during complex maneuvers.

403.4 Filter Selection Decision Tree

The following decision tree guides filter algorithm selection based on target motion characteristics and system constraints.

%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#2C3E50', 'primaryTextColor': '#fff', 'primaryBorderColor': '#16A085', 'lineColor': '#16A085', 'secondaryColor': '#E67E22', 'tertiaryColor': '#7F8C8D'}}}%%
flowchart TD
    START([Target Detected]) --> Q1{Motion Pattern?}

    Q1 -->|Constant Velocity| Q2{Gaussian Noise?}
    Q1 -->|Turns/Maneuvers| Q3{Energy Budget?}
    Q1 -->|Unknown| Q4[Start with Kalman]

    Q2 -->|Yes| KF[Kalman Filter<br/>RMSE: 1-2m<br/>Power: 100mW]
    Q2 -->|No - Outliers| EKF[Extended Kalman<br/>RMSE: 2-3m<br/>Power: 150mW]

    Q3 -->|High| PF[Particle Filter<br/>RMSE: 5-10m<br/>Power: 450mW]
    Q3 -->|Low| HYBRID[Hybrid Approach<br/>Switch on Motion]

    Q4 --> MONITOR{Innovation Check}
    MONITOR -->|Normal| KF
    MONITOR -->|Outliers| PF

    KF --> SUCCESS([Track Maintained])
    EKF --> SUCCESS
    PF --> SUCCESS
    HYBRID --> SUCCESS

    style KF fill:#16A085,stroke:#2C3E50,color:#fff
    style EKF fill:#E67E22,stroke:#2C3E50,color:#fff
    style PF fill:#2C3E50,stroke:#16A085,color:#fff
    style HYBRID fill:#7F8C8D,stroke:#2C3E50,color:#fff

For constant velocity motion with Gaussian noise, standard Kalman Filter achieves optimal 1-2m RMSE at low power (100mW). Non-Gaussian noise (outliers from multipath) requires Extended Kalman Filter with 2-3m accuracy. Turning/maneuvering targets need Particle Filter despite higher 450mW power consumption. Unknown motion patterns start with Kalman and monitor innovation sequence for outliers, triggering automatic switch to Particle Filter when linear assumption fails. Hybrid approach recommended for energy-constrained systems.

403.5 Tracking Implementation Pipeline

Flowchart diagram showing WSN tracking implementation with 8 phases: Setup (navy blue) includes sensor deployment and initialization; Detection (navy) shows sleep mode with target detection wake-up; Measurement (navy) performs RSSI/TDOA data collection; Estimation (orange) branches to Kalman Filter for linear motion or Particle Filter for non-linear motion; Prediction (orange) updates state and forecasts next position; Management (teal) handles data association and track lifecycle; Coordination (navy) manages clusters and handoff; Output (gray) provides visualization, alerts, and logging with feedback loop to detection phase.

Algorithm Selection: Kalman Filter for linear motion (constant velocity), Particle Filter for non-linear motion (turns, unpredictable movement)

403.5.1 Phase Descriptions

Phase	Name	Key Operations	Duration
1	Setup	Deploy sensors, initialize state machines	One-time
2	Detection	Sleep mode, periodic wake, event trigger	Continuous
3	Measurement	RSSI/TDOA collection, signal processing	10-100 ms
4	Estimation	Filter update (Kalman/Particle)	1-10 ms
5	Prediction	State forecast, activation map	1-5 ms
6	Management	Data association, track lifecycle	5-20 ms
7	Coordination	Cluster formation, handoff	50-200 ms
8	Output	Visualization, alerts, logging	10-50 ms

403.6 Framework Architecture

Four-layer architecture diagram for WSN tracking framework. Application Layer (gray box) at top contains visualization, alerts, history, and metrics. Processing Layer (orange box) contains tracking algorithms (Kalman/Particle/EKF), data association (nearest neighbor/gating/lifecycle), prediction models (velocity/acceleration), and energy management. Network Layer (teal box) contains cluster formation, head election, handoff, aggregation, and routing. Sensing Layer (navy box) at bottom contains state machine (sleep/idle/detecting/reporting), sensors (motion/camera/acoustic), battery monitoring, and duty cycling. Solid bidirectional arrows connect adjacent layers. Dashed downward arrows show energy commands and predictions flowing to sensing layer.

Inter-Layer Data Flow: Application to/from Processing (bidirectional: tracks, alerts, historical data), Processing to/from Network (bidirectional: position updates, track assignments, aggregated data), Network to/from Sensing (bidirectional: cluster info, detection events, energy status), Energy Management to Sensing (downward: activation commands, duty cycle control), Prediction to Sensing (downward: predicted positions for proactive activation)

403.6.1 Layer Responsibilities

Layer	Primary Functions	Key Components
Application	User interface, alerts, history	Visualization, metrics, logging
Processing	Position estimation, prediction	Kalman/Particle filters, data association
Network	Multi-hop routing, clustering	Cluster head election, handoff
Sensing	Detection, measurement	State machine, duty cycling

403.7 Sensor State Machine

State machine diagram for sensor energy-efficient tracking showing 8 states: Sleep (0.1-1 mW ultra-low power), Idle (10-50 mW listening), Detecting (50-100 mW RSSI/TDOA), Reporting (100-200 mW transmit data), Clustering (50-150 mW coordination), ClusterHead (50-150 mW manage/aggregate), ClusterMember (50-100 mW support), and Handoff (50-100 mW transfer tracking). Transitions include: Sleep to Idle (wake timer/prediction), Idle to Detecting (signal detected), Detecting to Reporting (target confirmed), Reporting to Clustering (join cluster), Clustering to ClusterHead/Member (election with 60% battery + 40% centrality), both cluster states to Handoff (target leaving/assist), Handoff to Idle (complete/failed), and cluster states to Sleep (battery <20%).

Cluster Head Election: 60% battery weight + 40% centrality weight

403.7.1 State Power Consumption

State	Power (mW)	Duration	Purpose
Sleep	0.1-1	Hours	Ultra-low power standby
Idle	10-50	Seconds-Minutes	Active listening
Detecting	50-100	Milliseconds	RSSI/TDOA measurement
Reporting	100-200	Milliseconds	Data transmission
Clustering	50-150	Seconds	Neighbor coordination
ClusterHead	50-150	Minutes	Data aggregation
ClusterMember	50-100	Minutes	Support operations
Handoff	50-100	Seconds	Tracking transfer

403.7.2 State Transition Rules

Sleep to Idle: Wake timer expires OR prediction command received
Idle to Detecting: Signal strength exceeds threshold
Detecting to Reporting: Target confirmed (3+ detections)
Reporting to Clustering: Join formation initiated
Clustering to Role: Election based on battery (60%) + centrality (40%)
Role to Handoff: Target leaving sensor range
Role to Sleep: Battery below 20% threshold

For Beginners: Understanding Sensor States

Think of each sensor like a guard dog:

Sleep: Deep asleep, barely breathing (uses almost no energy)
Idle: Ears perked, listening for sounds (low energy, ready to act)
Detecting: Alert! Something detected, investigating (moderate energy)
Reporting: Barking to alert the owner (high energy for transmission)
Clustering: Coordinating with nearby dogs about what to watch
ClusterHead: The lead dog organizing the pack
ClusterMember: Following the lead dog’s commands
Handoff: Passing watch duty to the next dog as intruder moves away

This coordination lets sensors work together efficiently without wasting battery!

403.8 Summary

This chapter covered the algorithmic foundations for WSN tracking implementations:

Filter Selection Criteria: Kalman Filter for linear motion (1-2m RMSE, 100 mW), Particle Filter for non-linear motion (5-10m RMSE, 450 mW), Hybrid approach for energy optimization
8-Phase Pipeline: Setup, Detection, Measurement, Estimation, Prediction, Management, Coordination, Output - forming complete tracking workflow
4-Layer Architecture: Application (visualization), Processing (algorithms), Network (routing), Sensing (detection) - with bidirectional data flow
State Machine Design: 8 states from Sleep (0.1 mW) to ClusterHead (150 mW) with transition rules for energy-efficient operation
Cluster Head Election: Weighted selection using 60% battery level + 40% network centrality

403.9 What’s Next

The next chapter covers WSN Tracking Implementation: Systems, exploring three complete implementation examples: Multi-Target Tracking, Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks (WMSN), and Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks (UWASN).