Compare GNSS, Wi-Fi, BLE, UWB, LoRa, cellular, and RFID against real IoT location requirements
animation
location
positioning
gnss
ble
uwb
wifi
rfid
human-factors
selection
Interactive IoT location technology selector with scenario presets, requirement sliders, visible scoring, ranked technologies, hybrid recommendation, formula trace, and mobile-safe reference material.
AnimationLocationTechnology Choice
Location Technology Selector
Choose a positioning approach by matching requirements to real tradeoffs. Compare indoor and outdoor fit,
accuracy, update rate, battery life, infrastructure, coverage, and cost before deciding whether one technology is enough.
GNSS/GPSRecommended technology
91/100Fit score
Weak indoorsMain caveat
TryChoose Warehouse assets, set Indoor share to 100%, Accuracy need to level 5, and Infrastructure tolerance to 4.
ObserveRecommended technology moves from GNSS toward UWB as 100% indoor coverage and high accuracy outweigh infrastructure cost; Fit score ranks the compromise.
ExplainEach technology's accuracy, indoor availability, range, update rate, power, infrastructure, and cost profile is weighted against the 7 selected requirements.
Technical boundariesScores are qualitative profiles, not surveyed error distributions; anchor geometry, multipath, floor plans, RF regulation, installation labour, calibration, outages, and fusion filters are omitted.
GNSS works well outdoors but usually fails indoors. Indoor systems need anchors, beacons, readers, or Wi-Fi data.
Accuracy costs
Centimeter and sub-meter location usually needs more infrastructure, calibration, power, or device cost.
Update rate matters
Tracking a moving worker needs different updates than finding a pallet once per hour.
Hybrid is common
Many deployments combine wide-area location with a precise indoor or gateway-level method.
1
Requirements
State what must be located and why.
2
Environment
Indoor, outdoor, or mixed conditions.
3
Accuracy
Match precision to the decision.
4
Constraints
Power, cost, update rate, and infrastructure.
5
Decision
Choose one method or a hybrid.
RequirementsStart by describing what location decision the system must support.
Requirements
Start by describing what location decision the system must support.
Stage 1 of 5
What to compareStart with the use case
Location technology is chosen from the decision the user or system must make, not from accuracy alone.
DiagnosisOutdoor coverage drives choice
GNSS and cellular score well when outdoor coverage matters more than indoor precision.
RecommendationUse GNSS/GPS
Use GNSS for outdoor fixes, and add cellular or gateway fallback when coverage is uncertain.
Controls
Pick a scenario, play through the selection stages, then adjust requirements to see which technologies rise or fall.
Scenario
Location requirements
Deployment constraints
How the Selector Scores Technologies
The score is a teaching heuristic for shortlisting. It helps explain tradeoffs, but a real deployment still needs a site survey and tests.
Accuracy fitaccuracy_fit = penalty_when_typical_accuracy_is_coarser_than_requiredMore precise than needed is acceptable, but it may still lose points through cost or infrastructure.Environment fitenvironment_fit = indoor_share * indoor_strength + outdoor_share * outdoor_strengthGNSS favors outdoor share; BLE, UWB, Wi-Fi, and RFID favor indoor or local zones.Constraint fitconstraint_fit = power_fit + infrastructure_fit + range_fit + update_fit + cost_fitDeployment constraints explain why the most accurate method is not always the best method.Total scorescore = weighted_sum(accuracy, environment, power, infrastructure, range, update, cost)High scores are shortlist candidates. Close scores are a signal to test or combine methods.
Reference Material
Use these cards to connect the selector to practical IoT location decisions.
Quick Reference
GNSS/GPSGood for outdoor tracking with no local infrastructure; weak indoors and higher power than simple tags.Wi-Fi positioningUseful where Wi-Fi already exists; accuracy depends on survey quality, density, and building changes.BLE beaconsLow-power indoor proximity or room-level tracking; RSSI distance estimates are noisy.UWBHigh-precision indoor ranging when anchors are installed and geometry is good.LoRa locationWide-area, low-power coarse location; useful when exact position is less important.RFID/NFCBest for identification at portals, shelves, checkpoints, or zones rather than continuous coordinates.
Selection Checklist
State the decisionKnow whether the system needs a coordinate, a room, a shelf, a zone, or proof of passing a checkpoint.Match the environmentSeparate indoor, outdoor, underground, metal, rural, and dense urban conditions before scoring.Choose needed accuracyDo not demand centimeter accuracy if the task only needs a room, yard, or route segment.Check update rateFast movement, safety alerts, or navigation need more frequent updates than inventory audits.Count infrastructureAnchors, beacons, readers, cabling, calibration, and maintenance often dominate total cost.Plan fallbackHybrid designs help when the device moves between outdoor, indoor, and no-coverage areas.
Technical Accuracy Notes
Typical accuracy variesNumbers here are approximate. Multipath, antenna placement, calibration, and density can dominate.RSSI is not a rulerBLE and Wi-Fi signal strength can support proximity, but walls and people make distance estimates noisy.UWB needs geometryPrecision depends on anchor placement, line of sight, clocking, and site-specific installation quality.GNSS has urban limitsBuildings, tunnels, foliage, and indoor areas can make GNSS unavailable or misleading.Privacy mattersPeople tracking requires clear purpose, consent or policy basis, retention limits, and access control.Validate on siteAlways test with real devices, mounting positions, movement, interference, and maintenance workflows.
Related Interactive Tools
Use these to connect location choices to user experience and system behavior.