Bound a parking occupancy claim

Pair two parking objects with trip sensing, then distinguish an occupancy event from a governed public service claim.

Packet Pete, your practice guide

Packet Pete
Predict the reading, then compare it with the measurement.

Cisco Packet Tracer

Desktop lab

Tier 3 · Install required · Cisco account required

Version tested: Cisco Packet Tracer 9.0.1 on Ubuntu 22.04 (Apptainer/Xvfb); project saved and reopened 2026-09-10. Date: 2026-09-10.

Install the tool; build from the steps. No file yet.

Download the Packet Tracer file

Need the app? Get Packet Tracer free from Cisco Networking Academy (free NetAcad login required).

Steps

Screens captured against Cisco Packet Tracer Cisco Packet Tracer 9.0.1 on Ubuntu 22.04 (Apptainer/Xvfb); project saved and reopened 2026-09-10 on 2026-09-10; the tool may have moved on — the text steps are the contract.

  1. Step 1

    Do
    Open lab.pkt in Packet Tracer and inspect the named Things in the Logical workspace.
    You will see
    Bay-01-Car and Bay-02-Car are paired with Bay-01-Trip and Bay-02-Trip, with Parking-Lamp as an action endpoint.
    Why it matters
    Naming each sensor, dependency, action, and evidence source makes the test boundary reproducible.

  2. Step 2

    Do
    On the Logical canvas, read the chapter-specific names beneath the devices and compare their roles.
    You will see
    The Logical canvas shows two parking bays, two trip sensors, and one lamp in this lab's named workspace.
    Why it matters
    Different physical jobs can share a network while still requiring different thresholds, safe states, and operating evidence.

  3. Step 3

    Do
    On the Logical canvas, trace the solid PC0 cable and any visible dotted wireless associations back to Home Gateway0.
    You will see
    The solid black line connects PC0 to Home Gateway0; where dotted lines are visible, they mark wireless associations.
    Why it matters
    A visible association is evidence of topology, not by itself proof of authentication, registration, or delivery.

  4. Step 4

    Do
    On the Logical canvas, identify each object that has no visible gateway line; do not count it as registered evidence.
    You will see
    Objects without a line to Home Gateway0 remain visibly outside the registered control path.
    Why it matters
    Packet Tracer physical objects are not automatically network endpoints, so an absent line must remain explicit.

  5. Step 5

    Do
    On the Logical canvas, use the model captions and names to separate sensing, actuation, service, and physical-context roles.
    You will see
    The device names and model captions distinguish sensors, actuators, service endpoints, and physical context.
    Why it matters
    Role labels keep a plausible diagram from being mistaken for measured control-loop behavior.

  6. Step 6

    Do
    Close and reopen lab.pkt, then compare the restored Logical workspace with this evidence image.
    You will see
    After reopening the saved project, the same lab-specific names, positions, and connection lines remain visible.
    Why it matters
    A reopen check proves persistence of the saved topology without inventing runtime readings or protocol semantics.

Chapter checks

These questions refer to the chapter’s examples. Use the return links to review their answers.

  1. Per this chapter, when is a city sensor deployment still just an 'instrumentation pilot' rather than a smart-city service?

    Return to the chapter’s knowledge check

  2. Per this chapter's integration-contract guidance, what should happen to the public and operator view when a LoRaWAN gateway goes down or an air-quality sensor drifts after calibration expires?

    Return to the chapter’s knowledge check

Return to Smart Cities: Parking and Governance · Browse Labs