Skip to content

Test a two-zone farm dependency

Compare two farm sensing zones and test which observations remain when the shared gateway is unavailable.

Packet Pete, your practice guide

Packet Pete
Predict the reading, then compare it with the measurement.

Cisco Packet Tracer

Desktop lab

Tier 3 · Install required · Cisco account required

Version tested: Cisco Packet Tracer 9.0.1 on Ubuntu 22.04 (Apptainer/Xvfb); project saved and reopened 2026-09-10. Date: 2026-09-10.

Install the tool; build from the steps. No file yet.

Download the Packet Tracer file

Need the app? Get Packet Tracer free from Cisco Networking Academy (free NetAcad login required).

Steps

Screens captured against Cisco Packet Tracer Cisco Packet Tracer 9.0.1 on Ubuntu 22.04 (Apptainer/Xvfb); project saved and reopened 2026-09-10 on 2026-09-10; the tool may have moved on — the text steps are the contract.

  1. 1 Step 1

    Do
    Open lab.pkt in Packet Tracer and inspect the named Things in the Logical workspace.
    You will see
    North-Humidity and North-Sprinkler form one zone; South-Temperature and South-Sprinkler form another beside Farm-Server.
    Why it matters
    Naming each sensor, dependency, action, and evidence source makes the test boundary reproducible.
    Step 1: real Cisco Packet Tracer 9.0.1 view showing North-Humidity and North-Sprinkler form one zone; South-Temperature and South-Sprinkler form another beside Farm-Server
    Step 1 · Cisco Packet Tracer; numbered callout added to a real capture. Enlarge screenshot (new tab)
  2. 2 Step 2

    Do
    On the Logical canvas, read the chapter-specific names beneath the devices and compare their roles.
    You will see
    The Logical canvas shows two sensing zones and their local sprinkler Things in this lab's named workspace.
    Why it matters
    Different physical jobs can share a network while still requiring different thresholds, safe states, and operating evidence.
    Step 2: real Cisco Packet Tracer 9.0.1 view showing The Logical canvas shows two sensing zones and their local sprinkler Things in this lab's named workspace
    Step 2 · Cisco Packet Tracer; numbered callout added to a real capture. Enlarge screenshot (new tab)
  3. 3 Step 3

    Do
    On the Logical canvas, trace the solid PC0 cable and any visible dotted wireless associations back to Home Gateway0.
    You will see
    The solid black line connects PC0 to Home Gateway0; where dotted lines are visible, they mark wireless associations.
    Why it matters
    A visible association is evidence of topology, not by itself proof of authentication, registration, or delivery.
    Step 3: real Cisco Packet Tracer 9.0.1 view showing The solid black line connects PC0 to Home Gateway0; where dotted lines are visible, they mark wireless associations
    Step 3 · Cisco Packet Tracer; numbered callout added to a real capture. Enlarge screenshot (new tab)
  4. 4 Step 4

    Do
    On the Logical canvas, identify each object that has no visible gateway line; do not count it as registered evidence.
    You will see
    Objects without a line to Home Gateway0 remain visibly outside the registered control path.
    Why it matters
    Packet Tracer physical objects are not automatically network endpoints, so an absent line must remain explicit.
    Step 4: real Cisco Packet Tracer 9.0.1 view showing Objects without a line to Home Gateway0 remain visibly outside the registered control path
    Step 4 · Cisco Packet Tracer; numbered callout added to a real capture. Enlarge screenshot (new tab)
  5. 5 Step 5

    Do
    On the Logical canvas, use the model captions and names to separate sensing, actuation, service, and physical-context roles.
    You will see
    The device names and model captions distinguish sensors, actuators, service endpoints, and physical context.
    Why it matters
    Role labels keep a plausible diagram from being mistaken for measured control-loop behavior.
    Step 5: real Cisco Packet Tracer 9.0.1 view showing The device names and model captions distinguish sensors, actuators, service endpoints, and physical context
    Step 5 · Cisco Packet Tracer; numbered callout added to a real capture. Enlarge screenshot (new tab)
  6. 6 Step 6

    Do
    Close and reopen lab.pkt, then compare the restored Logical workspace with this evidence image.
    You will see
    After reopening the saved project, the same lab-specific names, positions, and connection lines remain visible.
    Why it matters
    A reopen check proves persistence of the saved topology without inventing runtime readings or protocol semantics.
    Step 6: real Cisco Packet Tracer 9.0.1 view showing After reopening the saved project, the same lab-specific names, positions, and connection lines remain visible
    Step 6 · Cisco Packet Tracer; numbered callout added to a real capture. Enlarge screenshot (new tab)

Chapter checks

These questions refer to the chapter’s examples. Use the return links to review their answers.

  1. A vineyard manager is deploying soil moisture sensors across a 40-hectare field with 3 distinct soil types. Using this chapter's minimum planning baseline of five sensors per soil zone, how many sensors are required before adjusting for topographic variation?

    Return to the chapter’s knowledge check
  2. A farmer needs 200 battery-powered soil-moisture nodes across a remote 500-hectare field with no cellular service. Each sends 12 bytes hourly. The farm can place an elevated gateway with separate internet backhaul. Which sensor-to-gateway connectivity is the best first design to test?

    Return to the chapter’s knowledge check

Caution

The project exposes a shared-gateway failure domain but does not model radio fading, solar reserve, weatherproofing, sensor calibration drift, or a second live backhaul.

Return to Smart Agriculture: Deployment and Resilience · Browse Labs