Test a two-zone farm dependency
Compare two farm sensing zones and test which observations remain when the shared gateway is unavailable.

Packet Pete
Predict the reading, then compare it with the measurement.
Cisco Packet Tracer
Desktop labInstall the tool; build from the steps. No file yet.
Download the Packet Tracer fileSteps
Step 1
- Do
- Open lab.pkt in Packet Tracer and inspect the named Things in the Logical workspace.
- You will see
- North-Humidity and North-Sprinkler form one zone; South-Temperature and South-Sprinkler form another beside Farm-Server.
- Why it matters
- Naming each sensor, dependency, action, and evidence source makes the test boundary reproducible.

Step 1 · Cisco Packet Tracer; numbered callout added to a real capture. Enlarge screenshot (new tab) Step 2
- Do
- On the Logical canvas, read the chapter-specific names beneath the devices and compare their roles.
- You will see
- The Logical canvas shows two sensing zones and their local sprinkler Things in this lab's named workspace.
- Why it matters
- Different physical jobs can share a network while still requiring different thresholds, safe states, and operating evidence.

Step 2 · Cisco Packet Tracer; numbered callout added to a real capture. Enlarge screenshot (new tab) Step 3
- Do
- On the Logical canvas, trace the solid PC0 cable and any visible dotted wireless associations back to Home Gateway0.
- You will see
- The solid black line connects PC0 to Home Gateway0; where dotted lines are visible, they mark wireless associations.
- Why it matters
- A visible association is evidence of topology, not by itself proof of authentication, registration, or delivery.

Step 3 · Cisco Packet Tracer; numbered callout added to a real capture. Enlarge screenshot (new tab) Step 4
- Do
- On the Logical canvas, identify each object that has no visible gateway line; do not count it as registered evidence.
- You will see
- Objects without a line to Home Gateway0 remain visibly outside the registered control path.
- Why it matters
- Packet Tracer physical objects are not automatically network endpoints, so an absent line must remain explicit.

Step 4 · Cisco Packet Tracer; numbered callout added to a real capture. Enlarge screenshot (new tab) Step 5
- Do
- On the Logical canvas, use the model captions and names to separate sensing, actuation, service, and physical-context roles.
- You will see
- The device names and model captions distinguish sensors, actuators, service endpoints, and physical context.
- Why it matters
- Role labels keep a plausible diagram from being mistaken for measured control-loop behavior.

Step 5 · Cisco Packet Tracer; numbered callout added to a real capture. Enlarge screenshot (new tab) Step 6
- Do
- Close and reopen lab.pkt, then compare the restored Logical workspace with this evidence image.
- You will see
- After reopening the saved project, the same lab-specific names, positions, and connection lines remain visible.
- Why it matters
- A reopen check proves persistence of the saved topology without inventing runtime readings or protocol semantics.

Step 6 · Cisco Packet Tracer; numbered callout added to a real capture. Enlarge screenshot (new tab)
Chapter checks
These questions refer to the chapter’s examples. Use the return links to review their answers.
A vineyard manager is deploying soil moisture sensors across a 40-hectare field with 3 distinct soil types. Using this chapter's minimum planning baseline of five sensors per soil zone, how many sensors are required before adjusting for topographic variation?
Return to the chapter’s knowledge checkA farmer needs 200 battery-powered soil-moisture nodes across a remote 500-hectare field with no cellular service. Each sends 12 bytes hourly. The farm can place an elevated gateway with separate internet backhaul. Which sensor-to-gateway connectivity is the best first design to test?
Return to the chapter’s knowledge check
Return to Smart Agriculture: Deployment and Resilience · Browse Labs