Math Bridge: Photodiode Responsivity

← Back to Proximity and Light Readout Physics
Math BridgeSensorsStruggle-friendly runway

How does one microamp reveal the light power?

One thread from photon energy to electron flow, responsivity, and the chapter's 1.82 microwatt signal.

Phoebe, the physics guidePhoebe guides
The one targetTurn photon counts into current per watt.
The chapter case850 nm, η = 0.8, I = 1 µA.
What it buys youTest whether a readout describes real light.

A field team faces an unresolved physical question: How does one microamp reveal the light power? They must answer it before changing photodiode wavelength in nanometres on the real device. Predict the direction first.

See the relationship before changing it

The figure reads from left to right. The blue card is photodiode wavelength in nanometres. The middle card applies this page's relationship. The green card is photon energy. Walk the arrows once: set the input, apply the rule, then read the result with its unit.

The retained audit below checks several chapter fixtures. This added model holds every other chapter fixture fixed, so the numeric fixture does not switch without explanation.

Photodiode wavelength in nanometres changes photon energy An input card leads through the page relationship to the photon energy result. SET INPUT ONE CONTROL APPLY RULE predict calculate check units READ RESULT
Walk the arrows. Longer wavelength lowers energy per photon and raises the ideal current per watt, provided the material can still absorb those photons.

Derive the baseline in four named moves

  1. 1

    Name the input. The chapter baseline for photodiode wavelength in nanometres is 850.

  2. 2

    Name the relationship. E=hc/λ; Rmax=q/E; R=ηRmax; P=I/R

  3. 3

    Substitute the chapter fixture. Set photodiode wavelength in nanometres to 850. The page ledger gives photon energy as 1.46 eV.

  4. 4

    Read the result. Keep eV beside the value. Use it only inside the technical boundary on this page.

Predict, then change photodiode wavelength in nanometres

Try Predict the direction of photon energy. Move one control, calculate, then check your prediction.

850
Chapter baseline
Photon energy

Observe Longer wavelength lowers energy per photon and raises the ideal current per watt, provided the material can still absorb those photons. Reset the control to 850 and compare photon energy.

Explain Only photodiode wavelength in nanometres moves here. The other chapter fixtures remain fixed.

Check yourself

What should you do before trusting a moved-control result?
Answer: Predict its direction, apply the shown relationship, keep the units, and reset to the worked baseline.
What does this small model leave out?
Answer: Only photodiode wavelength in nanometres moves. Field effects named in the page's technical boundary stay fixed.

1. A watt arrives as photons

Optical power is energy per second. Light at a chosen wavelength packages that energy into photons, so the first job is to find the energy in one photon.

Phoebe: Longer-wavelength photons each carry less energy, so the same watt contains more of them.

2. Find one photon's energy

1

Convert wavelength850 nm = 850 × 10⁻⁹ m.

2

Substitute into E = hc/λUse h = 6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ J·s and c = 3.00 × 10⁸ m/s.

Ephoton = hc/λ = 2.34 × 10⁻¹⁹ J = 1.46 eV

3. Count useful electrons

3

Apply quantum efficiencyOnly the fraction η of photons creates collected charge.

4

Divide current by optical powerR = I/P = ηq/Ephoton = ηqλ/(hc).

Rmax = 0.685 A/W; η = 0.8 ⇒ R = 0.548 A/W

4. Try the wavelength

E=hc/λ; Rmax=q/E; R=ηRmax; P=I/R

TryMove wavelength while the chapter's η = 0.8 and 1 µA current stay fixed.

Photon energy J
Photon energy
Ideal responsivity
At η = 0.8
Power for 1 µA

ObserveAt 850 nm, one photon carries 2.34 × 10⁻¹⁹ J and the 80%-efficient diode gives 0.548 A/W. A 1 µA current therefore traces back to 1.82 µW.

ExplainLonger wavelength lowers energy per photon and raises the ideal current per watt, provided the material can still absorb those photons.

Technical boundaries.

This runway treats η as fixed and

wavelength-dependent absorption
Needs separate evidence
reflection
Needs separate evidence
dark current
Needs separate evidence
shot noise
Needs separate evidence
junction capacitance
Needs separate evidence
amplifier noise
Needs separate evidence
saturation
Needs separate evidence
temperature
Needs separate evidence
optical geometry
Needs separate evidence
Real responsivity must come from the actual photodiode datasheet
Needs separate evidence

Use field evidence or a deeper model before release.

5. Invert the chapter's current

Poptical = Iphoto/R = 1 × 10⁻⁶/0.548 = 1.82 µW

This is the optical power at the diode, not LED output power and not total light in the room. Geometry and reflection decide how much source power reaches the detector.

6. Connect to the voltage readout

The chapter's transimpedance stage turns the photocurrent into a voltage. Responsivity explains the optical-to-current step; feedback resistance and amplifier limits govern the current-to-voltage step.

7. Check yourself

Why does 850 nm light have about 1.46 eV per photon?
Answer: Substitute 850 × 10⁻⁹ m into E = hc/λ, then divide joules by the electron charge.
Why is real responsivity below 0.685 A/W here?
Answer: The chapter uses η = 0.8, so only 80% of arriving photons produce collected charge.
Does 1.82 µW state the LED's emitted power?
Answer: No. It is the inferred power reaching the photodiode under the stated responsivity.
Honesty boundary.

These are the chapter inputs, worked results, and named teaching assumptions.

850 nm wavelength
Distance, wavelength, or size
η ≈ 0.8
Named physical or model constant
0.548 A/W responsivity
Power or power-loss value
1 µA current
Current or responsivity value
1.82 µW result reproduce the chapter
Power or power-loss value
The constants h
Inductance value
c
Chapter input or worked result
q are physical constants
Named physical or model constant

This is a one-target responsivity runway, not a complete optical link or amplifier design; Under the Hood retains those limits.