Math Bridge: Installed Antenna Efficiency

← Back to NB-IoT Coverage Enhancement
Math BridgeCellular IoTStruggle-friendly runway

How can the same antenna lose 6.69 dB after installation?

Turn radiation efficiency into realized gain, EIRP, receive aperture, and the idealized repetition cost of replacing lost link margin.

Radio Remi, the guideRadio Remi guides
The one targetConvert installed efficiency into link-budget consequences.
The chapter case0 dBi at 900 MHz, 23 dBm, 70% roof versus 15% cabinet.
What it buys youClassify coverage by installation, not datasheet optimism.

A field team faces an unresolved physical question: How can the same antenna lose 6.69 dB after installation? They must answer it before changing installed antenna efficiency on the real device. Predict the direction first.

See the relationship before changing it

The figure reads from left to right. The blue card is installed antenna efficiency. The middle card applies this page's relationship. The green card is installed eirp. Walk the arrows once: set the input, apply the rule, then read the result with its unit.

The retained audit below checks several chapter fixtures. This added model holds every other chapter fixture fixed, so the numeric fixture does not switch without explanation.

Installed antenna efficiency changes installed eirp An input card leads through the page relationship to the installed eirp result. SET INPUT ONE CONTROL APPLY RULE predict calculate check units READ RESULT
Walk the arrows. Gain, EIRP, and aperture all fall because the same efficiency fraction appears in the underlying power transfer. Repetition can trade time and energy for some margin; it does not repair the antenna.

Derive the baseline in four named moves

  1. 1

    Name the input. The chapter baseline for installed antenna efficiency is 0.15.

  2. 2

    Name the relationship. Grealized=Gdata+10log10(η); Ae=ηGdataλ²/(4π)

  3. 3

    Substitute the chapter fixture. Set installed antenna efficiency to 0.15. The page ledger gives installed eirp as 14.76 dBm.

  4. 4

    Read the result. Keep dBm beside the value. Use it only inside the technical boundary on this page.

Predict, then change installed antenna efficiency

Try Predict the direction of installed eirp. Move one control, calculate, then check your prediction.

0.15
Chapter baseline
Installed EIRP

Observe Gain, EIRP, and aperture all fall because the same efficiency fraction appears in the underlying power transfer. Repetition can trade time and energy for some margin; it does not repair the antenna. Reset the control to 0.15 and compare installed eirp.

Explain Only installed antenna efficiency moves here. The other chapter fixtures remain fixed.

Check yourself

What should you do before trusting a moved-control result?
Answer: Predict its direction, apply the shown relationship, keep the units, and reset to the worked baseline.
What does this small model leave out?
Answer: Only installed antenna efficiency moves. Field effects named in the page's technical boundary stay fixed.

Honesty note. This teaching model changes only installed antenna efficiency. It replays the chapter fixture; it is not a field prediction.

1. Start with a fraction

Efficiency η is the share of accepted power that becomes a useful radio wave. Nearby metal, loss, and a poor match can reduce it after the antenna leaves the lab. Lost power becomes heat or a reflected wave.

Radio Remi: The antenna part did not change. Its new setting changed how much power escapes.

2. Name the algebra moves

1

Turn efficiency into dBGrealized=Gdatasheet+10log10(η).

2

Add to conducted powerEIRP=Pt+Grealized.

3

Find receive apertureAe=ηGλ²/(4π).

4

Price lost dBEach ideal doubling of repeated energy buys 10log10(2)=3.01 dB.

3. Compare two installations

10log10(0.70)−10log10(0.15)=6.69 dB

The loss is a ratio: 0.70/0.15=4.67. Under the ideal repeated-energy comparison, replacing 6.69 dB requires the same 4.67× energy ratio.

4. Try one controlled change

Grealized=Gdata+10log10(η); Ae=ηGdataλ²/(4π)

TryChange only installed radiation efficiency. The 0 dBi datasheet antenna, 0.333 m wavelength, 23 dBm transmitter, and 70% reference installation stay fixed.

Realized gain
Installed EIRP
Effective aperture
Penalty versus 70%
Ideal repetition doublings
Ideal energy multiplier

ObserveAt 15%, realized gain is −8.24 dBi, EIRP is 14.8 dBm, and aperture is 0.00132 m². Relative to 70%, the installation costs 6.69 dB, 2.22 ideal doublings, or 4.67× repeated energy.

ExplainGain, EIRP, and aperture all fall because the same efficiency fraction appears in the underlying power transfer. Repetition can trade time and energy for some margin; it does not repair the antenna.

Technical boundaries.

The efficiency values and repetition conversion are teaching comparisons.

Efficiency
Must be measured with the real enclosure, cable, ground, orientation, and nearby material
Combining
3.01 dB per doubling is an ideal energy-combining upper bound
Coverage
Interference, fading, network limits, retries, and receiver behavior remain

Approve the installation with conducted/radiated tests and on-site delivery evidence.

5. Reproduce the chapter values

At η=0.70, Grealized=−1.55 dBi and EIRP=21.45 dBm. At η=0.15, Grealized=−8.24 dBi and EIRP=14.76 dBm. With λ=0.333 m, Ae=0.00132 m². The 6.69 dB gap is 6.69/3.01=2.22 doublings and 2^2.22=4.67×.

6. Carry the evidence forward

Record antenna part and feed, enclosure, ground plane, cable loss, orientation, installation material, frequency, measured efficiency or realized gain, EIRP, RSRP/SINR, repetition state, delivery, retries, and energy.

7. Check yourself

Why is realized gain lower than 0 dBi at 15% efficiency?
Answer: 10log10(0.15) is −8.24 dB, so efficiency discounts the datasheet gain.
Does 4.67× prove the modem will repeat exactly 4.67 times more?
Answer: No. It is an ideal energy-equivalent ratio; standards use discrete modes and real combining is imperfect.
Why does receive aperture fall too?
Answer: Reciprocity applies the same loss to how effectively the installed antenna captures incoming wave power.
Honesty boundary.

The page turns installed efficiency into a bounded link-budget comparison. It does not certify coverage.

70% and 15%
Catalog-typical installation illustrations
6.69 dB
Efficiency-ratio penalty only
4.67×
Ideal repeated-energy equivalent, not a protocol trace

Release still needs the actual site's antenna, radio, network, and energy measurements.

Return to NB-IoT Coverage Enhancement with the maths unpacked →