A field team faces an unresolved physical question: How can a three-second freezer event look like a slow thirty-second wobble? They must answer it before changing interval on the real device. Predict the direction first.
See the relationship before changing it
The figure reads from left to right. The blue card is interval. The middle card applies this page's relationship. The green card is sample rate. Walk the arrows once: set the input, apply the rule, then read the result with its unit.
The retained audit below checks several chapter fixtures. This added model holds every other chapter fixture fixed, so the numeric fixture does not switch without explanation.
Derive the baseline in four named moves
- 1
Name the input. The chapter baseline for interval is 10.
- 2
Name the relationship. 1/10 s = 0.100 Hz; Nyquist = 0.050 Hz 1/3 s = 0.333 Hz; |0.333-3(0.100)| = 0.033 Hz required = 0.667 Hz, or 1.50 s; q = 0.806 mV; SNR = 74.0 dB
- 3
Substitute the chapter fixture. Set interval to 10. The page ledger gives sample rate as 0.1 Hz.
- 4
Read the result. Keep Hz beside the value. Use it only inside the technical boundary on this page.
Predict, then change interval
Try Predict the direction of sample rate. Move one control, calculate, then check your prediction.
Observe A cheap local sampler can satisfy physics while the gateway transmits only event evidence. Reset the control to 10 and compare sample rate.
Explain Only interval moves here. The other chapter fixtures remain fixed.
Check yourself
What should you do before trusting a moved-control result?
What does this small model leave out?
1. Picture a strobe
Slow observations can make fast change look like a different slow change. That false frequency is an alias.
2. Name every algebra move
Invert timefs=1/T.
HalveNyquist=fs/2.
Foldfalias=|f−round(f/fs)fs|.
Divide ADC spanq=Vref/2ᴺ.
3. Reproduce the chapter
1/3 s = 0.333 Hz; |0.333−3(0.100)| = 0.033 Hz
required = 0.667 Hz, or 1.50 s; q = 0.806 mV; SNR = 74.0 dB
The sample clock hides the event as ordinary slow drift.
4. Try the sample interval
TryShorten the interval toward the 1.5-second limit.
ObserveThe alias moves nonlinearly as the nearest spectral copy changes.
ExplainA cheap local sampler can satisfy physics while the gateway transmits only event evidence.
A single periodic component stands in for a door transient.
- Event
- Real door signals are not pure tones
- Filter
- No analogue anti-alias response
- Power
- No measured wake and processing cost
Measure detection probability and energy on hardware.
5. Split sensing from sending
Buffer frequent low-cost measurements locally and wake the radio only for evidence worth forwarding.
6. Record the contract
Keep filter, cadence, trigger, pre-event buffer, radio burst, outage behavior, and replay identity together.
7. Check yourself
What is the 10-second Nyquist ceiling?
Why is 1.5 seconds important?
Must every sample be transmitted?
The ten-second schedule is the chapter case; the door duration and ADC are labelled typical.
- 10 seconds
- Chapter freezer schedule
- 3 seconds
- Stated teaching transient
- 12 bit, 3.3 V
- Catalog-typical ADC
Correct, not complete: this model does not prove freezer monitoring coverage.
Data Dora guides