A technician must decide whether ideal repetition reduction factor is safe before changing installed antenna gain on the real device. The result is unresolved until the rule and units are checked. Predict the direction first.
See the relationship before changing it
The figure reads from left to right. The blue card is installed antenna gain. The middle card applies this page's rule. The green card is ideal repetition reduction factor. Walk the arrows once: set the input, apply the rule, then read the result with its unit.
The retained audit below checks several chapter fixtures. This model keeps those stated values fixed and changes only installed antenna gain, so the numeric fixture does not switch without explanation.
Derive the baseline in four named moves
- 1
Name the input. The chapter baseline is 8 dBi.
- 2
Name the relationship. factor = 10^(antenna gain / 10)
- 3
Substitute with units. 10^(8 / 10) = 6.31 times
- 4
Read the result. Keep the unit beside the value. Use it only inside the technical boundary on this page.
Predict, then change installed antenna gain
Try Predict the direction of factor = 10^(antenna gain / 10). Test another installed antenna gain, then compare ideal repetition reduction factor.
Observe Installed gain can reduce ideal repetition demand before supported steps are applied. Reset installed antenna gain to 8 and compare ideal repetition reduction factor.
Explain Installed gain can reduce ideal repetition demand before supported steps are applied.
Check yourself
What should you do before trusting a moved-control result?
What does this small model leave out?
1. Spend one decibel currency
Installed antenna improvement and ideal repetition combining can both close link margin. The antenna is a physical installation choice; repetitions charge airtime and energy on every affected message.
2. Name the algebra moves
Add installed gainEIRP=Pt+G.
Undo decibelsM=10^(G/10).
Find the ideal countRideal=R0/M.
Round conservativelyRstep=2^ceil(log2(Rideal)).
Compare airtimeReduction=R0/Rstep.
3. Correct the basement example
Under the page's power-of-two model, 32 is the next conservative step. Sixteen repeats would need 10log10(128/16)=9.03 dB, so 8 dB does not justify that step.
4. Try one controlled change
TryChange only installed antenna improvement. Conducted power, baseline count, and the explicit power-of-two model stay fixed.
ObserveAt 8.00 dBi, EIRP is 31.0 dBm, the ideal factor is 6.31×, the ideal count is 20.29, and the conservative model selects 32 repeats.
ExplainRounding upward keeps at least the required ideal combining margin. It yields a 4.00× repetition-airtime reduction, not the legacy eightfold claim.
The calculation is a conservative teaching model, not an NB-IoT scheduler.
- Gain
- The 8 dBi must be installed, directional, polarization-aware, and regulation-compliant
- Combining
- 10log10(R) is an ideal energy-combining upper bound
- Battery
- Attach, listening, processing, retries, sleep, and ageing remain outside repetition airtime
Confirm the actual grant set and measure delivery plus energy at the basement location.
5. See why sixteen is unsafe here
Dropping from 128 to 16 is an eightfold change. Its ideal gain is 10log10(8)=9.03 dB. An 8 dB antenna input leaves about 1.03 dB unpaid. Treat this as a bound.
6. Carry the field evidence
Record installed antenna pattern and loss, legal EIRP, RSRP, SINR, granted coverage level and repetitions, retries, payload delivery, transmit time, listening time, current trace, and battery model.
7. Check yourself
Why round 20.3 up to 32 rather than down to 16?
How much ideal gain does 128 to 16 need?
Does fourfold repetition-airtime reduction mean fourfold battery life?
The page corrects a category error while keeping the comparison explicitly bounded.
- 8 dBi
- Illustrative installed improvement
- 32
- Conservative power-of-two model result
- 4.00×
- Repetition airtime only
Go deeper into the chapter's application evidence, then validate installed RF, network behavior, and full energy.
Radio Remi guides