Deriving the Chapter’s FSPL Numbers
Deriving the Chapter’s FSPL Numbers
Ada reproduces the chapter’s free-space path-loss figures from one formula, across both unit conventions
ADA · CALCULATION AUDIT
Deriving the Chapter's FSPL Numbers
The physics story is spherical spreading; the mathematics is a logarithmic unit check. The chapter’s distance, frequency, and comparison numbers should all reproduce from one formula — 100 m at 915 MHz costs about 71.7 dB, the same span at 2.4 GHz costs about 80 dB, and doubling distance always adds a fixed 6.02 dB. This audit rebuilds each figure from one equation across both unit conventions.
Companion to the chapter Free-Space Path Loss — every number here comes from that chapter.
See the relationship before changing it
The figure reads from left to right. The blue card is radio path distance. The middle card applies this page's rule. The green card is free-space path loss at 915 mhz. Walk the arrows once: set the input, apply the rule, then read the result with its unit.
The retained audit below checks several chapter fixtures. This model keeps those stated values fixed and changes only radio path distance, so the numeric fixture does not switch without explanation.
Derive the baseline in four named moves
- 1
Name the input. The chapter baseline is 100 m.
- 2
Name the relationship. loss = 20 log10(distance in m) + 31.68 dB
- 3
Substitute with units. 20 log10(100) + 31.68 = 71.68 dB
- 4
Read the result. Keep the unit beside the value. Use it only inside the technical boundary on this page.
Predict, then change radio path distance
Try Predict the direction of loss = 20 log10(distance in m) + 31.68 dB. Test another radio path distance, then compare free-space path loss at 915 mhz.
Observe Doubling distance adds 6.02 dB when frequency stays at 915 MHz. Reset radio path distance to 100 and compare free-space path loss at 915 mhz.
Explain Doubling distance adds 6.02 dB when frequency stays at 915 MHz.
Check yourself
What should you do before trusting a moved-control result?
What does this small model leave out?
Ready: use the stated baseline inputs, then compare each displayed result.
Convert the Distance Once
1. Convert the distance once. The chapter uses the km/MHz form of FSPL, so the 100 m comparison becomes 0.1 km before any logarithms are taken:
| Chapter value | Calculation | Checked result |
| 100 m at 915 MHz | 20 log10(0.1) + 20 log10(915) + 32.45 = -20.00 + 59.23 + 32.45 | 71.68 dB, so about 71.7 dB |
| 100 m at 2.4 GHz | 20 log10(0.1) + 20 log10(2400) + 32.45 = -20.00 + 67.60 + 32.45 | 80.05 dB, so about 80 dB |
| Extra 2.4 GHz loss | 80.05 - 71.68, or 20 log10(2400 / 915) | 8.37 dB, so about 8.4 dB less headroom |
Verify the Same Answer With the Meters/Hz Convention
2. Verify the same answer with the meters/Hz convention. The alternate constant is useful only if the units change too:
Check the Distance-Doubling Rule From the Physics
3. Check the distance-doubling rule from the physics. Free-space power thins with distance squared, so the decibel penalty for doubling distance is independent of the starting range:
What the calculation buys you: these numbers are not range promises. They prove the open-air baseline before the review adds walls, antenna mismatch, Fresnel blockage, fade margin, receiver mode, and field evidence.
Every number above is taken from the chapter’s own FSPL example and re-derived step by step.