Energy & Power · Study deck

Energy Harvesting: Source Reality and Field Proof

A bench ledger balances and the storage calculation looks safe, but the field source is weaker and less regular than its peak rating.

Battery Bruno is your guide for this deck.

awareharvesting
Battery Bruno, the module guide, in a scene from this chapter.
iotclass.org

After studying this chapter

Learning objectives

You will be able to:

  • Explain: A source graphic associates these same $C$ and $V_f$ labels with 192 nJ, but those numbers do not satisfy $\tfrac12CV^2$; the chapter keeps the physically consistent derivation instead of propagating that mismatch.
  • Explain: An eight-ratio design can therefore cover a 0.6–2.4 V source while regulating a roughly 1.2 V load more efficiently than one fixed ratio across the whole range.
  • Explain: This conclusion depends on the assumptions above; finite horizon, leakage, conversion loss, non-stationary weather, or strict delay limits can all make the arrival shape matter again.
iotclass.org

Major section

TEGs Need Delta-T Across the Module

A hot pipe or warm enclosure is not enough.

  • Thermoelectric output depends on the temperature difference across the module after thermal contact resistance and heatsink limits are included.
A TEG module only produces useful power while its two faces stay at different temperatures; clamping both faces into the same warm enclosure removes the gradient that drives it. Photo: Gerardtv, CC BY-SA 3.0
A TEG module only produces useful power while its two faces stay at different temperatures; clamping both faces into the same warm enclosure removes the gradient that drives it. Photo: Gerardtv, CC BY-SA 3.0
iotclass.org

Major section

Energy-Arrival And Random-Access Calculator

An energy-harvested radio cannot schedule from average power alone.

  • Energy arrives unevenly, storage is finite, sleep electronics consume part of every arrival, and a random-access collision can force another expensive transmission.
  • Its slotted random-access model assumes each of the contending nodes transmits independently with probability $p$ in a slot, giving this node a success probability of $p(1-p)^{n-1}$.
  • Observe why reducing traffic can improve both collision probability and energy survival.
iotclass.org

Major section

Energy-Harvesting AWGN Capacity

The finite-store ledger makes that clipping mechanism inspectable slot by slot.

  • The inequality is the causality rule; the min is the overflow rule.
  • Energy arriving when the store is full is clipped and cannot be recovered later.
  • An infinite store can absorb high-arrival slots and release their energy during low-arrival slots.

Why it matters

An energy-harvesting transmitter differs from an ordinary battery-powered radio because its transmit power is constrained by causality: energy cannot be spent before it arrives.

Infinite and finite energy-harvesting batteries are compared through usable power and AWGN capacity expressions.
Infinite and finite energy-harvesting batteries are compared through usable power and AWGN capacity expressions.
iotclass.org

Major section

Energy-Harvesting AWGN Capacity (continued)

This conclusion depends on the assumptions above; finite horizon, leakage, conversion loss, non-stationary weather, or strict delay limits can all make the arrival shape matter again.

  • Finite storage changes the problem.
  • so the usable mean can fall below the harvested mean.
  • Actual overflow depends on the current buffer and power-control policy, and the logarithm is concave, so bursty power allocation does not behave like constant average power.
iotclass.org

Major section

Series-Parallel Harvesting Converter

A switched-capacitor converter changes voltage by reconfiguring flying capacitors between charge and transfer phases.

  • A family of switch configurations provides discrete conversion ratios.
  • An eight-ratio design can therefore cover a 0.6–2.4 V source while regulating a roughly 1.2 V load more efficiently than one fixed ratio across the whole range.

Key terms

Its series resistance
Its series resistance is part of the source model.

Why it matters

Ratio changes, bottom-plate parasitics, switch resistance, clock generation, leakage, and charge redistribution all reduce $\eta$.

Weak vibration, light, thermal, or RF energy is rectified, stored, converted by switched-capacitor stages, controlled by sensing, and released through power-good qualification.
Weak vibration, light, thermal, or RF energy is rectified, stored, converted by switched-capacitor stages, controlled by sensing, and released through power-good qualification.
iotclass.org

Major section

Step-Charging Derivation

Connecting an ideal voltage source directly to an initially discharged capacitor stores $\tfrac12CV^2$ in the capacitor and dissipates the same amount in the series path.

  • If the voltage rises through intermediate levels $V_0,V_1,\ldots,V_N=V_f$, the redistribution loss becomes.
  • A source graphic associates these same $C$ and $V_f$ labels with 192 nJ, but those numbers do not satisfy $\tfrac12CV^2$; the chapter keeps the physically consistent derivation instead of propagating that mismatch.
  • Real step charging also spends energy in switch gates, clock generation, leakage, and finite resistance, so ever-smaller steps eventually lose to control overhead.
iotclass.org

Deck summary

Key takeaways

A hot pipe or warm enclosure is not enough.

  • An energy-harvested radio cannot schedule from average power alone.
  • The finite-store ledger makes that clipping mechanism inspectable slot by slot.
  • This conclusion depends on the assumptions above; finite horizon, leakage, conversion loss, non-stationary weather, or strict delay limits can all make the arrival shape matter again.
  • A switched-capacitor converter changes voltage by reconfiguring flying capacitors between charge and transfer phases.
iotclass.org

Retrieval practice

Recall check 1 of 5

Battery Bruno says: answer from memory, then check your reasoning.

Q1A node consumes 6 mWh per day. A measured solar source provides 10 mWh on a winter day before conversion, and the charger/regulator path is 75 percent efficient. What is the best review conclusion?

AThe system fails because 10 mWh is less than twice the daily load
BUsable harvest exceeds load; verify storage for bad intervals.
CThe system is proven perpetual because the daily average is positive
DThe charger efficiency can be ignored because the source is renewable
Show answer

Answer: B Usable harvest is 7.5 mWh/day, which exceeds the 6 mWh/day load. That supports the design, but it does not prove survival through low-harvest intervals or storage recovery.

iotclass.org

Retrieval practice

Recall check 2 of 5

Battery Bruno says: answer from memory, then check your reasoning.

Q2Place each harvesting element where it lives so you can follow ambient energy into storage and schedule only affordable work.

AAmbient source
BDebug console
CMarketing claim
DStatic footer
Show answer

Answer: A Separate capture, conditioning, and load policy so you can size an energy-harvesting path without assuming continuous power.

iotclass.org

Retrieval practice

Recall check 3 of 5

Battery Bruno says: answer from memory, then check your reasoning.

Q3What does energy-neutral operation require of a harvesting node?

APeak harvested power exceeds peak load current at one instant.
BThe device never sleeps, so it always uses the harvested power immediately.
CAverage harvested power, after losses, at least equals the average load.
DThe battery is removed entirely and no storage is used.
Show answer

Answer: C Energy-neutral means the daily harvest at least matches the daily consumption, and because the source is intermittent, storage must bridge nights, cloudy spells, or still periods.

iotclass.org

Retrieval practice

Recall check 4 of 5

Battery Bruno says: answer from memory, then check your reasoning.

Q4A node needs 15.8 mWh per day. Using 2 peak-sun-hours and a derating of 0.7, what panel peak power makes it energy-neutral?

AAbout 11.3 mW, from 15.8 mWh divided by (2 h x 0.7).
BAbout 0.66 mW, equal to the average load power.
CAbout 7.9 mW, from 15.8 mWh divided by 2 h, ignoring derating.
DAbout 190 mW, treating the load as if it ran only during the 2 peak hours.
Show answer

Answer: A The panel must supply the daily energy within the effective harvest window: 15.8 / (2 x 0.7) = 11.3 mW peak. At 15 mW/cm2 that is under one square centimeter of outdoor cell.

iotclass.org

Retrieval practice

Recall check 5 of 5

Battery Bruno says: answer from memory, then check your reasoning.

Q5A solar node proven outdoors with a 1 cm2 cell is moved indoors and immediately starves. What is the fundamental reason?

AIndoor light has the wrong color and solar cells cannot use it at all.
BThe load must have increased when the device moved.
CMoving indoors increased self-discharge of the panel.
DIndoor light delivers about 10 uW/cm2 versus about 15 mW/cm2 outdoors.
Show answer

Answer: D The output density collapses by about three orders of magnitude indoors.

iotclass.org

Print reference

Answers 1 of 2

Answer key.

  1. B · Usable harvest is 7.5 mWh/day, which exceeds the 6 mWh/day load. That supports the design, but it does not prove survival through low-harvest intervals or storage recovery.
  2. A · Separate capture, conditioning, and load policy so you can size an energy-harvesting path without assuming continuous power.
  3. C · Energy-neutral means the daily harvest at least matches the daily consumption, and because the source is intermittent, storage must bridge nights, cloudy spells, or still periods.
iotclass.org

Print reference

Answers 2 of 2

Answer key.

  1. A · The panel must supply the daily energy within the effective harvest window: 15.8 / (2 x 0.7) = 11.3 mW peak. At 15 mW/cm2 that is under one square centimeter of outdoor cell.
  2. D · The output density collapses by about three orders of magnitude indoors.
iotclass.org