Campus access and cloud service responsibilities
Repair the campus access route and compare the cost and responsibilities of a self-hosted fog broker with managed AWS IoT Core.

Cloud Clara
Predict which checkpoint will change, then test the connection.
IoT Ideator
Design StudioRepair the campus access route and compare the cost and responsibilities of a self-hosted fog broker with managed AWS IoT Core.
Open the prepared mission; follow the guide and live checkpoints.
Open this design in the Design Studio (new tab)Steps
Step 1
- Do
- In the Working View canvas, select the Wi-Fi Module and inspect its access hop to AWS IoT Core.
- You will see
- Physical placement shows a 45 m hop against the mission’s 30 m teaching limit, leaving a 15 m deficit.
- Why it matters
- The chapter identifies network limits as part of cloud service use. A provider’s service boundary does not establish that your access path works.

Step 1 · IoT Ideator; numbered callout added to a real capture. Enlarge screenshot (new tab) Step 2
- Do
- In the Site canvas, replace Wi-Fi with nearby NB-IoT, linking ESP32–NB-IoT by Data/UART and NB-IoT–AWS IoT Core by Data/NB-IoT.
- You will see
- Removing the old link breaks the route check. With UART within 15 m, the connected NB-IoT and restored-route checks pass.
- Why it matters
- A service model describes which layers the provider manages. Changing the access link repairs a different boundary: the device’s route to that service.

Step 2 · IoT Ideator; numbered callout added to a real capture. Enlarge screenshot (new tab) Step 3
- Do
- In the Working View canvas, select the Fog Computing Node and inspect its connected alternative to AWS IoT Core.
- You will see
- The fog node remains connected beside the managed option. The drawn routes do not establish field connectivity or sensor accuracy.
- Why it matters
- The chapter’s traditional column leaves every stack layer with the customer. Comparing that boundary with a managed service exposes which operating work remains yours.

Step 3 · IoT Ideator; numbered callout added to a real capture. Enlarge screenshot (new tab) Step 4
- Do
- In the Day panel, read Operating cost / day and compare it with the mission’s $1 daily limit.
- You will see
- The recorded model shows $0.0015/day for broker and transport. That estimate excludes wider labour and outage costs.
- Why it matters
- The chapter separates buying infrastructure from managing the layers above it. A transport estimate cannot represent all the work retained by the customer.

Step 4 · IoT Ideator; numbered callout added to a real capture. Enlarge screenshot (new tab) Step 5
- Do
- In the Day panel, expand Service models and compare the 365-day totals and responsibility rows.
- You will see
- The recorded totals are $5,787.07 self-hosted and $2,190.59 managed. Both exclude migration, and the managed option retains shared responsibilities.
- Why it matters
- PaaS delegates infrastructure management while leaving application control with the customer. Reading responsibility rows beside costs makes the purchased boundary explicit.

Step 5 · IoT Ideator; numbered callout added to a real capture. Enlarge screenshot (new tab) Step 6
- Do
- In the Scenarios panel, enter the managed total, build/run/patch/support owners, retained fog duty, shifted core duty, and shared access failure.
- You will see
- All four mission checkpoints pass and Reflect unlocks after the required entries. Saved explanations remain learner claims about the catalogue design.
- Why it matters
- Provider-managed services still leave governance, configuration, and verification duties with the customer. Naming the remaining owner prevents a service label from hiding that work.

Step 6 · IoT Ideator; numbered callout added to a real capture. Enlarge screenshot (new tab)
Chapter checks
These questions refer to the chapter’s examples. Use the return links to review their answers.
A team wants to deploy an application they wrote without managing the operating system or server patching, but they still want to control the application's own configuration. Which service model definition matches this?
Return to the chapter’s knowledge checkIn the responsibility bracket, which layer is the first one that moves from the user's column to the provider's column when going from Traditional to IaaS?
Return to the chapter’s knowledge check
Return to Service Models: IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS · Browse Tutorials